The precedent for voluntary union of the colonies was set with the fundamental orders of Connecticut.
The landmark case that set a precedent for identifying a class of fundamental personal rights is Griswold v. Connecticut (1965). This case established the right to privacy as a fundamental right, extending protections to activities such as marital privacy and contraception. The ruling in Griswold laid the foundation for future cases involving personal autonomy and privacy rights.
precedent
No, the Nuremberg trials established that individuals are responsible for their actions, even if they were following orders. The principle of "just following orders" is not a valid defense for committing war crimes or crimes against humanity.
That depends on which court you're referring to. In the federal court system, the US Supreme Court sets binding (or mandatory) precedent for all lower courts; the US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts set binding precedent for all US District Courts within their jurisdiction, but only persuasive precedent elsewhere; the US District Courts do not set binding precedent at all, they only set persuasive precedent.
Washington set an important precedent at the end of his second term.In 1796,he decided not to run for a third term
baptists
the fundamental orders of Connecticut where important were because it let non- church people vote
The Kalamazoo Case of 1874 set a precedent that taxing citizens for secondary education (post elementary school) was legal.
Babur was the Mughal emperor who set the precedent of being tolerant toward other religions.
George Washington set this precedent when he refused to run for a third term despite encouragement from many to do so.
hi
Jack millman