i think you have to conduct multiple trials :)
The only valid scientific proof that a certain "diet" works (promotes weight loss) would be repeated, peer-reviewed, consistently unbiased experimental results. It is safe to say that most companies do their own testing, if any, and get results that make them money.
test it out
Observations, or experimental results would be alternatives.
performing the experiment multiply times.
i would assume it is known as a solution
To prove that the changes were due to the procedure, you would need to establish a cause-and-effect relationship by controlling other variables that could influence the outcome. This can be done through experimental design, statistical analysis, and replication of the results. Additionally, documenting the process and data collection methods can help support the claim that the changes were a result of the procedure.
I dnt kno
Yes, but, extradition procedure would usually apply if the named person is taken into custody by authorities.
The peer review process.......(studyisland)
A common source of error in an experiment could be measurement inaccuracies caused by instrument limitations, human errors, or environmental factors such as temperature fluctuations. Additionally, inconsistencies in sample preparation, experimental procedure, or data collection can also introduce errors into the results.
a veterinarian
The conclusion, plain and simple, is the answer to your question. It should be clear, concise and stick to the point. Resist the temptation to jump to conclusions.If you were to do your experiment again, would you get the same results?Can there be differences? Why?Ask yourself what happened when you tested your hypothesis.What have you learned?