There's written testimony of eyewitness accounts of Caesar's murder. The conspirators also admitted killing him.
yes their is proof he existed
it's possible but we don't have any proof
It was done in public with hundreds of people watching.
"The proof of it will turn to redder drops." The palindrome is, of course, "redder".
In the end it all basically comes down to one thing: Power. Yes, Caesar may have been arrogant and impatient, but the real reason for his dislike was his power. The senate was always used to the equal power of the Roman Republic among the senators, and when Caesar became Dictator, they did not like it at all. Caesar was hugely popular with the plebians and common folk, being as he had always sent his plunder in Gaul to be sent back and handed out to the citizens. He was also very popular with his troops, all of which gained tremendous respect for him during the Gallic wars. Because of all this, the Senate disliked him.
Yes, Gaius Julius Caesar was a real person. He was the person who evolved the Roman republic into the Roman empire and arguably, one of the most influential figures in all of history. If it wasn't for him, the world would be a totally different place. His adopted son became Augustus Caesar after Julius Caesar was assinated by thirteen members of the roman senate.
Yes, Napoleon Bonaparte did have epilepsy, as did Julius Caesar.
If you are talking about Julius Caesar, even after Brutus has committed the assassination with the other members of the conspiracy, questions remain as to whether, in light of his friendship with Caesar, the murder was a noble, decidedly selfless act or proof of a truly evil callousness. If the latter, some people would see it as callousness that they bathed their hands in Caesar's blood.
Caesar had Marullas and Flavius executed for defacing the images of Caesar. This is proof to Cassius and Brutus that Caesar is too powerful and must be stopped.
Julius Caesar had only one child, a daughter, named Julia. Cleopatra claimed that her oldest son son was fathered by Caesar, but there are serious doubts about this as Caesar never acknowledged the boy. (Plus strong political reasons for Cleopatra to claim that her son was Caesar's) Many history writers claim that Caesar was sterile. Several years after Caesar's death, a man from Gaul claimed that he was Caesar's grandson, but according to Seutonius, he claim was quickly debunked.
Brutus uses the word "augmented" in the following scene: But 'tis a common proof, That lowliness is young ambition's ladder, Whereto the climber-upward turns his face; But when he once attains the upmost round. He then unto the ladder turns his back, Looks in the clouds, scorning the base degrees By which he did ascend. So Caesar may. Then, lest he may, prevent. And, since the quarrel Will bear no colour for the thing he is, Fashion it thus; that what he is, augmented, Would run to these and these extremities: And therefore think him as a serpent's egg Which, hatch'd, would, as his kind, grow mischievous, And kill him in the shell.
The relatioship between Cleopatra and Caesar was one of mutual benefit, as was Cleopatra's relationship later with Marc Antony. One of the reasons that Caesar came to Egypt in the first place, was to see about payment of the massive debt that Egypt owed him. Cleo's father had borrowed heavily from the Roman money lenders in order to get his throne back, and Caesar and Pompey had bought up the debt. Pompey, being dead, Caesar could claim all the cash. However at that time Egypt was in financial trouble. So, Cleopatra was established on the throne, (Caesar had the authority to do this) along with her brother, and in return Caesar was to start getting payments. Forget about the big romance fable, knowing the character of Julius Caesar, the "romance" could not have been more than a one night stand. At any rate, Caesar, who was a good judge of character, never trusted Cleopatra. Proof of this is in the words of the officer who wrote the history of the Alexandrian War. He says that Caesar left four legions in Egypt for a double purpose. One was to safeguard Cleopatra and her brother, if they remained loyal, (they lacked popular support in Alexandria,) and the second was to coerce their loyalty if they were ungrateful.Caesar and Cleopatra's relationship was nothing like the romantics would have you believe. As Caesar was a known womanizer, he probably had a one night stand or two, with Cleo and then went on to other "conquests". Yes, there was a child, but his paternity is seriously disputed. At any rate, the relationship between Caesar and Cleopatra was for their mutual benefit. Cleopatra's father, Ptolemy XII, had been ousted from his throne and he wanted it back. He went to Rome and took out massive loans in order to pay armies to get his throne back. He died before he could repay. The money lenders in Rome, anxious for a return on their investment, sold the loan to the two wealthiest men in Rome, Caesar and Pompey. Caesar came to Egypt, not only chasing after Pompey, but chasing after his money too. In the settlement after the Alexandrian War, Caesar established Cleo on the throne, with the understanding that Cleopatra would pay him what he was owed. He left troops with her when he returned to Rome, both to see that she remained on the throne (the Alexandrians did not want her as queen and were notorious for overthrowing their rulers) and to made sure that she held up her end of the bargain, as, according to the writer of the Alexandrian war, Caesar did not entirely trust Cleopatra.