some one bad brains like the cans must have done it .
There is currently no credible evidence or scientific consensus to support the claim that Mohenjo-daro was destroyed by a nuclear weapon. The theory does not align with archaeological findings or historical records of the ancient Indus Valley civilization. Most experts believe that the city's decline was likely due to environmental factors, such as natural disasters or changes in the river's course.
So that they/their items are not destroyed.
First, get some sort of proof that it was NOT destroyed before it was repoed, call the lender who had it repoed and askk for repairs to it. If they refuse, call a local attorney.
Bullet-proof glass. Sealed interior impervious to chemical & biological weapons.
things that are resistant. For example steel is fireproof meaning it shall not be destroyed by fire no matter what. Many disater-prone cities use earthquake proof or hurrican proof. Most buildings in Japan had some sort of standing structure since they were ready for earthquakes and hurricanes.
AUSTRALIA! Australia. india may have nuclear weapons but nuclear weapons are hated by the UN and any other nation that doesnt have 45% of there population as poverty (and i would like to point out that there is a UN nuclear treaty that was signed by every country in the world other than INDIA! and NORTH KOREA, and i stand to believe that north Korea is lead by a dictator so this says a lot about india)so if india were to use nuclear weapons the country would exports, imports and stock exchange with Australia, china , USA and Europe. we also have have really BIG allies like the U.S and England. our technology is more up to date. they maybe bigger but we have a better quality ARMY, NAVY and AIR FORCE. we have really good invasion proof seas with constant patrol from the NAVY and airfoce. the airforce also has the AP-3C orion which whic has radar that can scan for miles for submarines and warships, it has anit-submarine and anti-ship weapons that can destroy them in one shot and acts as a early warning system for invasion.
Historians believe that our civilivation will be destroyed because of proof from past civilizations. The Mayans, Incans, and so many other cultures were destroyed from disease and war. As we get smarter, though, we get deadlier. The Mayans were extremely smart...they invented planetariums and the calender. Therefore, as we invent giant nuclear weapons and scientists begin to break the confines of the box we have been living in, the world is contisuosly falling into a spiral of no return. One monster diesease and we could easily be wiped out, leaving the world to deranged scientists with a different view of what society should be. By different view, I mean brainwashed. But we cannot blame ourselves, because it is human nature. The whole 'eye for an eye' thing is getting old, but yet it continues. We can break history, it isn't impossible, but the facts line up...we can fail like past civilizations.
Japan was trying to develop weapons which could reach the US. balloon carrying fire bombs did reach the US but those didn't do much. The real deal was that Germany was trying to develop an atomic bomb but the US beat them. We don't have proof that Japan were trying to develop one. August 6 and 9 1945, Japan suffered the pain of the nuclear bombs.
An image made by printing the remaining ink on a plate onto paper after it has been destroyed is called a "cancellation proof." This process creates a unique print that can serve as a record of the plate's existence.
When it came to nuclear weapons, his policy was "trust but verify." In other words if the Soviet Union agreed to stop producing weapons or if they said they were disassembling them we would trust them but we wanted proof. It's kind of like an oxymoron. He did say at one point that the Soviet Union was an evil empire. He described the then Soviet Union as the Empire of Evil.
George Bush told America it was nessecary to invade Iraq because they had weapons of mass destruction, but apparently, those weapons were never found. Others think Bush actually invaded Iraq for oil. Saddam Hussein was changing excess petrodollars into petroeuros so the army invaded Iraq and took over the oil again
I am sorry but I can't decipher the meaning of your question, so I can't answer it. Perhaps if it was worded more clearly.