69
No. General is a higher rank.
A colonel has a higher rank than a brigadier. In military hierarchy, a brigadier typically refers to a brigadier general, which is a one-star general rank, while a colonel is a senior field officer rank, generally above a lieutenant colonel and below a brigadier general. Thus, in terms of ranking, a colonel ranks lower than a brigadier general.
There is no rank called "colonial." The rank "Colonel" is below General and above Lt. Colonel, Major, Captain, and so on.
Colonel is higher. Lieutenant is a modifier that can be applied to colonel, general and governor and indicates an inferior rank to the rank it modifies.
Yes, colonel is considered a high rank in the military, typically ranking above lieutenant colonel and below brigadier general.
In most armies 'Colonel' is a regiment Commander and the highest 'field ' rank before getting into General officers.
The rank following Colonel in the Marines, Army, and Air Force is Brigadier General.
General. Company can be a colonel.
In the US Army, a full bird refers to a Colonel, which is the rank between Lieutenant Colonel and Brigadier General.
General. But I've heard of people calling major generals "general" out of respect. As in if they have 2 or 3 disignations, always refer to the highest. Wouldn't want to call a major general "major."
Brigadier general;)
No. There are 4, sometimes 5 ranks of General that are higher. (brigadier general, major general, lieutenant general, general, and general of the army) Colonel is the highest non-Flag/General officer rank. All the Generals must be nominated by the President and approved by the Senate. Colonels do not require this.