0
What reasoning uses specific observations to make generalizations?
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When general conclusions are drawn from specific observations what type of reasoning is used?
inductive reasoningThe type of reasoning that involves using specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations are called inductive reasons.
What type of reasoning involves using many specific pieces of evidence make generalizations?
inductive reasoningThe type of reasoning that involves using specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations are called inductive reasons.
Inductive reasoning is empirical in nature which means that it is based on?
Inductive reasoning use theories and assumptions to validate observations. It involves reasoning from a specific case or cases to derive a general rule. The result of inductive reasoning are not always certain because it uses conclusion from observations to make generalizations. Inductive reasoning is helpful for extrapolation, prediction, and part to whole arguments.
When scientist proceed from the particular to general?
inductive reasoningThe type of reasoning that involves using specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations are called inductive reasons.
What type of reasoning uses the general knowledge of science to make prediction about specific case?
Deductive reasoning
When general conclusions are drawn from specific observations what type of reasoning is used?
inductive reasoningThe type of reasoning that involves using specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations are called inductive reasons.
What type of reasoning involve using many specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations?
inductive reasoningThe type of reasoning that involves using specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations are called inductive reasons.
What type of reasoning involves us many specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations?
inductive reasoningThe type of reasoning that involves using specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations are called inductive reasons.
What type of reasoning involves using many specific pieces of evidence make generalizations?
inductive reasoningThe type of reasoning that involves using specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations are called inductive reasons.
Inductive reasoning is empirical in nature which means that it is based on?
Inductive reasoning use theories and assumptions to validate observations. It involves reasoning from a specific case or cases to derive a general rule. The result of inductive reasoning are not always certain because it uses conclusion from observations to make generalizations. Inductive reasoning is helpful for extrapolation, prediction, and part to whole arguments.
When scientist proceed from the particular to general?
inductive reasoningThe type of reasoning that involves using specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations are called inductive reasons.
What type of reasoning involves using many specifics pieces of evidence to make generalization?
inductive reasoningThe type of reasoning that involves using specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations are called inductive reasons.
What type of reason involves using many specific pieces of evidence to make generalization?
inductive reasoningThe type of reasoning that involves using specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations are called inductive reasons.
What is inductive reasoning moves from what to what?
The use of a specific observation to reach a general conclusion. (APEX)
What type of reasoning do criminal investigators use?
Criminal investigators use deductive reasoning, which involves drawing conclusions by applying general principles to specific cases based on available evidence. They also rely on inductive reasoning, where they make generalizations based on specific instances they have encountered during investigations. Additionally, they use abductive reasoning to form hypotheses about potential explanations for the evidence they have collected.
Inductive and deductive?
Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations or examples, while deductive reasoning involves starting with general premises and using them to reach specific conclusions. Inductive reasoning is more probabilistic and involves making educated guesses, while deductive reasoning is more logical and deterministic. Both types of reasoning are used to draw conclusions and make decisions in various fields such as science, mathematics, and philosophy.
Describe a conclusion reached from observations?
A "conjecture" is a conclusion reached simply from observations...this is a process known as "inductive reasoning". An example would be a weather forecast. The difference between "inductive reasoning" and "deductive reasoning" is that with deductive reasoning, the answer must "necessarily" follow from a set of premises. Inductive reasoning is the process by which you make a mathematical "hypothesis" given a set of observations
