None, but Christians have done it a lot in the past.
The opposite of "should be" is "should not be." "Should be" implies that something is expected or preferred, while "should not be" implies that something is not expected or preferred.
Violence should only be used on a teddy bear
Discouraging violence is advisable.
those religion which can try and successful to save humanity and human moral values. also they increase the faith on peace not war.they have to prove wor is not solution peace is solution for war and progress. those religion have to success in saving culture and woman's soul and pride. they should respect womans. because woman is power. those religion have to kill the communities wrong differences between different cast.
Nobody, women, men or children should suffer violence against their person in our (so called) civilised society. Violence in any form is a crime and should be stopped.
Yes family violence should be avoided as much as possible. One of the ways to avoid violence is to dialogue and make room for peace and love.
Most certainly not. The vast majority of Muslims abhor such violence and acts of murder, as do adherents to other religions. To naively assign wanton violence to a particular religion in foolish and shows the ignorance of the assigner. Such acts are carried out by misguided individuals, not by Islam, Christianity, Buddhism or any other major religion.
"allowed" implies there should be sanctions- inappropriate
Islam is the right religion and the one you should follow
religion should always be first.
Hopefully, you will never have to. Only in extreme situations should you use violence, such as to defend yourself from a physical attack.
Because of the word "Violence" traumatizing is automatically included; without traumatization of violence there would be neither.