Want this question answered?
If the results of the test were known ahead of time, there would be no point in running the test.
It depends on what the test is, the accuracy of the test, and other factors. If it is a drug test, it is likely that the court and the employer would accept the results unless they suspect that the results were inaccurate or inconclusive. In that case, they would probably request that the person take another test.
No, the skin would not absorb enough alcohol to alter the test results.
Results is the information that came out of an expirement or a test. A conclusion would be what you infered from the results, like a result of a test is an A+, your conclusion would be, that person is smart.
Am
The Western blot test is used to confirm the results
The preliminary results of the test were negative, but later results told a different story.
Lachman Test Aaron D. House
The results of your certification test are usually mailed to you with a month or two of taking the test. If you don't receive your results you should contact the company that administered the test.
You would test your hypothesis by predicting what the results of your experiment will be so it's like a type of prediction. Another way is what do you think the outcome will be.
The test is done on an animal to "prove" results in a human. Thefore the experiment is being done in a less than perfect model. It would be more scientific to test the substance on a human. However, it would be less ethical to test a substance with unknown results on a human.
test it out