The same as in any misdemeanor criminal case. The right to be confronted by your accuser (probably the officer that arrested you) - to testify in your own behalf and present a defense.
Public drunkenness is the state of being drunk in public- a public display of drunkenness. Public intoxication laws vary from country to country and state to state. In some jurisdictions the person is taken into protective custody until the drunkenness wears off. IF the person is found to be drunk and disorderly they are subject to arrest.
personal
the state is pa
Your "public drunkenness" charge will be tried separate and apart from the DUI case however, unless your attorney bars any mention of the previous DUI arrest it could be referred to and used against you to establish a pattern of voluntary alcohol abuse. By the same token - unless your attorney is successful in barring introduction of the public drunkenness arrest (which occurred subsequent to the DUI) that could be introduced and used against you to show predeliction to alcohol abuse and reckless acts. Pardon my saying so, but you need to get your act together, you could be in serious trouble.
what is public rights doctrin
people with US public performance rights have US public performance rights. Would I be "right" ??
The man blamed the violent assault on his drunkenness
Public records are just that - public. Nobody can have exclusive rights to them
No, the correct spelling is drunkenness.
If the police came to your party it was undoubtedly in response to a complaint. Upon their arrival, if they observe that the party is creating a "public nuisance" or they observe any violation of the law (i.e. - public drunkenness or underage drinking, etc) they may end the gathering. If a violation of the law occurred they may also cite or arrest the party giver.
Private rights are held by individuals, while public rights are held by the public at large. Falling somewhere in the middle are "communal rights", where all members of one geographic, cultural or historic community hold the rights, but not the general public. Classic examples of public rights include the public right to use highways and public rights of navigation and fishing. That being said, some courts or commentators have found support for a broader range of public rights. In 2004 the Supreme Court of Canada appeared to endorse early statements that the public has general rights in respect of running water, air and the oceans, and suggested that there might be a general class of public environmental rights. In general the common law court have only allowed the government to enforce public rights, and it has been difficult or impossible for individual members of the public to have a status in court to enforce such rights.
The ability to protest and to attend public meetings is part of our civil rights. These rights are protected by the Bill of Rights.