The colonists listed their grievances against the king of England in the Declaration of Independence. Among their rights and liberties they felt the king had violated was refusing the colonists representation in Parliament as well as dissolving the representative houses that the colonies did have, taxing without representation, and quartering troops in the colonies when the colonial legislatures did not consent to it.
The colonists listed their grievances against the king of England in the Declaration of Independence. Among their rights and liberties they felt the king had violated was refusing the colonists representation in Parliament as well as dissolving the representative houses that the colonies did have, taxing without representation, and quartering troops in the colonies when the colonial legislatures did not consent to it.
The colonists listed their grievances against the king of England in the Declaration of Independence. Among their rights and liberties they felt the king had violated was refusing the colonists representation in Parliament as well as dissolving the representative houses that the colonies did have, taxing without representation, and quartering troops in the colonies when the colonial legislatures did not consent to it.
They believe the rights of property owners are being violated.
Jigerboo!
Jigerboo!
Jigerboo!
Jigerboo!
Jigerboo!
You might want to check out the Constitution's position on that in the 1830s--I dont think that, according to the constitution, the Native Americans had many rights at that time so perhaps their rights were not violated because they had none at all. If you were talking about the universal rights we have today regarding all beings, then they were DEFINITELY violated--they had no political say, they had no inclusion in legal rights, and they were raped, tortured, moved out of their homes, and killed brutally.
The American public did nothing .... the Patriot Act suspended the Bill of Rights
Some states believed in the doctrine of states rights in which they did not have to obey Federal Laws if they felt that it violated the constitution.
Teenagers might claim that their right to privacy is being violated by the searches, as they have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their personal belongings and spaces. They could also argue that such searches may constitute a form of discrimination or unequal treatment, especially if they are disproportionately targeted based on race or socioeconomic status. Additionally, they might assert that these searches infringe upon their rights to freedom from arbitrary interference and the right to express themselves freely.