there was sword near him,he took it and killed her
Beowulf is extremely confident of his victory over Grendel. That was a victory he was proud of, he kept Grendels arm as a trophy basically. He wanted to show off that HE was the one to defeat the moster Grendel and that no one else did. So once Grendels mother took the arm away from him she took his "trophy" away from him. By Grendels mother taking the arm she was basically testing Beowulf. She was basically trying to show that she took his "trophy" back and if he wanted it back he had to go to her lair and get it himself.
Beowulf tries using Hrunting, the sword the Danes had given him, to attack Grendel's mother because the mother wanted to avenge her son's death and was followed into her home in the lake by Beowulf. Beowulf's weapon was Hrunting and so he tried attacking the mom because of her previous actions (avenging the death of her son Grendel- the monster Beowulf killed- by killing a close friend of the king Hrothgar who's men were killed by Grendel, and retrieving Grendel's arm that hung from the rafters of Herot after the battle when Beowulf hung it there from tearing it off Grendel).
it bit him and his venom was poisionious. bit him on the neck, then Beowulf killed the dragon. Beowulf later died.
there was sword near him,he took it and killed her
The male monster slain by Beowulf in the old English epic Beowulf is named Grendel. Grendel is a descendant of the biblical figure Cain and terrorizes the Danes for years before being killed by Beowulf in combat.
Beowulf rescued Handscio by severing the arm of Grendel's mother as she was trying to drag Handscio into her lair. This act saved Handscio's life and prevented him from being dragged into the depths with Grendel's mother.
well at first unferth calls Beowulf a poppycock hero and that he wont defeat grendel, but that's because he was drunk, after Beowulf defeats grendel then unferth apalogizes to Beowulf and gives him a sword.
It is a matter of opinion regarding whether or not the behavior of Grendel's mother seems as wicked or unreasonable as Grendel's behavior. Grendel's mother was simply avenging the death of her son, so many would argue she wasn't as wicked.
After slaying Grendal's mother and being rewarded by Hrothgar, Beowulf announced that he was returning home. With the assistance of Hrothgar's men, he loaded the treasures on his ship and sailed with them back to his homeland. In at least one instance he retained the treasures for quite some time; when he fought the dragon some 50 years later, he wielded the sword Nægling, an heirloom from Hrothgar's family given to him after Beowulf killed Grendal's mother.
The warriors lost hope because they saw that Beowulf was being attacked by Grendel's mother underwater and it appeared that he was in grave danger. They feared that they were witnessing Beowulf's defeat and were not sure if he would emerge victorious.
Moses mother made a basket and put it in the river Nile with the baby in it.
the book explains in more relevant detail the classical story of Beowulf. The scriptwriters of Beowulf the movie made a good attempt at keeping the movie classical all the while not understanding that it went from a classical epic novel in to your average Hollywood production. The scenes of near nudity where very innapropriate. In the book it explaines grendal as more of a monstorous killer who is like a thief in the night and slaughters soldiers like its nothing. In the movie it shows that grendal is a half crazy half sensitive killer which they do not explain in the movie at allDifferences from the poem"It occurred to me that Grendel has always been described as the son of Cain, meaning half-man, half-demon, but his mother was always said to be full demon. So who's the father? It must be Hrothgar, and if Grendel is dragging men back to the cave then it must be for the mother, so that she can attempt to sire another of demonkind."- Roger Avary[1] One objective of Neil Gaiman and Roger Avary was to offer their own interpretation for motivations behind Grendel's behavior as well as for what happened when Beowulf was in the cave of Grendel's mother. They justified these choices by arguing that Beowulf acts as an unreliable narrator in the portion of the poem in which he describes his battle with Grendel's mother.[13] These choices also helped them to better connect the third act to the second of their screenplay, which is divided in the poem by a 50-year gap.[14]Some of the changes made by the film as noted by scholars include:the portrayal of Beowulf as a flawed manthe portrayal of Hrothgar as a womanizing alcoholicthe portrayal of Unferth as a ChristianBeowulf's funeralthe portrayal of Grendel's mother as a beautiful seductress who brought Grendel as Hrothgar's child and the dragon as Beowulf's childthe fact that Beowulf becomes ruler of Denmark instead of his native Geatland[15][16][17]Scholars and authors have also commented on these changes. Southern Methodist University's Director of Medieval Studies Bonnie Wheeler is "convinced that the new Robert Zemeckis movie treatment sacrifices the power of the original for a plot line that propels Beowulf into seduction by Angelina Jolie-the mother of the monster he has just slain. What man doesn't get involved with Angelina Jolie?' Wheeler asks. 'It's a great cop-out on a great poem.' ... 'For me, the sad thing is the movie returns to…a view of the horror of woman, the monstrous female who will kill off the male,' Wheeler says. 'It seems to me you could do so much better now. And the story of Beowulf is so much more powerful.'"[18] Other commentators pointed to the theories elucidated in John Grigsby's work Beowulf and Grendel, where Grendel's mother was linked with the ancient Germanic fertility goddess Nerthus.[19]This is not the first time that the theme of a relationship between Beowulf and Grendel's mother was explored. In Gaiman's collection of short stories, Smoke and Mirrors, there is a poem, Bay Wolf, which is a retelling of Beowulf in a modern day setting. In this story, Beowulf as the narrator, leaves it ambiguous as to exactly what happened between him and Grendel's mother.In addition, philosophy professor Stephen T. Asma argues that "Zemeckis's more tender-minded film version suggests that the people who cast out Grendel are the real monsters. The monster, according to this charity paradigm, is just misunderstood rather than evil (similar to the version presented in John Gardner's novel Grendel). The blame for Grendel's violence is shifted to the humans, who sinned against him earlier and brought the vengeance upon themselves. The only real monsters, in this tradition, are pride and prejudice. In the film, Grendel is even visually altered after his injury to look like an innocent, albeit scaly, little child. In the original Beowulf, the monsters are outcasts because they're bad (just as Cain, their progenitor, was outcast because he killed his brother), but in the film Beowulf the monsters are bad because they're outcasts [...] Contrary to the original Beowulf, the new film wants us to understand and humanize our monsters."[20]Citation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beowulf_%282007_film%29#cite_note-14