The Al-Qaeda are headquartered there, and so are the Taliban, and they are both terrorist groups.
Father and son. :)
it seems you are only looking for a guy who loves you for who you are and to love you and make out with you forever
There is a direct relationship. The higher the frequency, the higher the perceived pitch.
There does not seem to be a correlation between the type of government and terrorism. This is because the causes of terrorism are many, and can be found in all forms of government. And, of course, the type of government that terrorism targets also seems to have little to do with the reasons terrorists targets them. That is, all forms of government seem to spawn terrorist groups, and all forms of government seem to fall victim to them, and a reasonably equal rate. I know of no study that has shown any link between the governmental form and terrorism, either as a cause or target.
It appears that infection of the mosquito by the parasite seems to increase the mosquitoes' survival.
It appears that infection of the mosquito by the parasite seems to increase the mosquitoes' survival.
A preposition shows the relationship, usually by introducing a phrase that gives the subject or the verb a place or time. Example:The cat is on the sofa. The preposition is 'on' and the phrase, 'the sofa' is the object of the preposition.
correct. but one religon seems to have the most terrorists.
Perhaps. Terrorism isn't something that should be tolerated, regardless of whether or not it seems necessary. Of course, acting against 'terrorism' has resulted in continued conflict and many deaths. Whether or not the United States should act against terrorism is a subject for debate, and the answer isn't a simple 'yes' or 'no'. It's really up to the individual to make up their mind. But regardless of whether we should or not, the US seems to be combating it anyway.
i am not sure. it seems that casual relationship compares between to things where there is no relationship and no sense. just is. on the other hand, an actual relationship does make sense. both these phrases mean the the same thing: comparing 2 different independent and dependent variables. it's just that casual relationship is inconsistent and makes no sense.
Tenuous means thin, shaky, not solid or secure. So if you say, for instance, there seems to be a tenuous relationship between what I eat and my grade point average, you might mean that it seems like there is some relationship between the two based on your own personal experience, but you don't really have any solid evidence to support the idea that your diet is affecting your ability to study or take tests well.
The word "below" seems to imply that there is some graphic. However, I see no such graphic.