You need a scientific conclusion to sum up everything that you have done and in the conclusion it will also give the answer.
If a conclusion is valid, similar investigations by other scientists should result in the same conclusion.
A scientific model is a theoretical explanation of some phenomenon; the model is the conclusion, it is not the steps by which the conclusion was reached. The sequence of reasoning would just be called a scientific argument.
it might be conclusion but Iam wrong
It is definitely part of the scientific method to form conclusions.
You need a scientific conclusion to sum up everything that you have done and in the conclusion it will also give the answer.
If a conclusion is valid, similar investigations by other scientists should result in the same conclusion.
A scientific conclusion that is supported can be said to have been confirmed, or verified.
With a [final] "Conclusion" (end result of research, an experiment. etc.)
The result of a scientific experiment is the conclusion.
A scientific conclusion should be based on evidence and data analysis. It should also be objective, drawing logical inferences from the results obtained rather than being influenced by personal biases or opinions.
A scientific model is a theoretical explanation of some phenomenon; the model is the conclusion, it is not the steps by which the conclusion was reached. The sequence of reasoning would just be called a scientific argument.
A scientific observation is data , a hypothesis , and well a conclusion. Your observing or testing something that can lead you to your conclusion
state a theory
a conclusion
Conclusive
A conclusion is a result that can be drawn from a scientific experiment A reason is an example of proof why or how you know the conclusion is right