whether the data supports the hypothesis
You should ask yourself if the data supported your hypothesis.
Did you prove or disprove your hypothesis? This is the first question to ask when evaluating an experiment.
Do you have a question
whether the data supports the hypothesis
You should ask yourself if the data supported your hypothesis
You should ask yourself if the data supported your hypothesis.
whether the data supports the hypothesis
The conclusion for a lava lamp experiment depends on the thesis. If the thesis talks about the temperature for example the conclusion should reflect that.
The conclusion of a controlled experiment must be based on the results obtained from the experiment itself. It should directly address the research question or hypothesis posed at the beginning of the experiment. The conclusion should also highlight any patterns, trends, or relationships observed in the data collected during the experiment.
No... scientific inquiry begins by coming up with a question. From there you develop a hypothesis, test the hypothesis, alter your hypothesis if need be, test again, etc. Only after you have data that supports your hypothesis (if it ever does) do you draw any conclusions. If your data consistently does not support your hypothesis, no matter how it is modified, you may draw conclusions about your basic contentions as well. YES BUT..... what should you ask yourself in drawing a conclusion about an experiment?
Is the information your reviewing provided or your own? Does the appearance support the hypothesis or the evidence? Ever heard of devils advocat?
The conclusion, plain and simple, is the answer to your question. It should be clear, concise and stick to the point. Resist the temptation to jump to conclusions.If you were to do your experiment again, would you get the same results?Can there be differences? Why?Ask yourself what happened when you tested your hypothesis.What have you learned?