answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

If evolution is slow and steady, we'd expect to see the entire transition, from ancestor to descendent, displayed as transitional forms over a long period of time in the fossil record.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What should you observe in the fossil record if evolution is slow and steady?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

While conducting an experiment using the scientific method the scientist should?

observe and record data.


What While conducting an experiment using the scientific method scientist should?

observe and record data.


List the evidences for animal evolution?

The evidence for animal and human evolution is so overwhelming that it is not possible to list it all within the scope of a short .Following decades of research, Charles Darwin published his book, The Evolution of Species in 1859. This contains copious evidence for evolution by natural selection, yet Darwin barely touched on the wealth of detail that we now have on evolution.Darwin, writing at a time when the known fossil record was scanty, barely touched on what we now know. We now have an extensive fossil record of the evolution of numerous species, with intermediate forms showing how one species or genus has gradually evolved into others.A good scientific theory should be able to predict facts that we do not yet know. The discoverers of Tiktaalik Roseaebelieved that the Theory of Evolution predicted that a species intermediate between fish and amphibians should be discovered in specific rock layers of a proposed search area, went there and soon found what they were looking for.Recent advances in our knowledge of DNA now mean that we have another scientific basis for animal evolution. For example, scientists can use DNA evidence to ascertain that our human ancestors diverged from the ancestors of the chimpanzee some seven million years ago. That this seems consistent with the dossil record should not be regarded as a mere coincidence.


Which step of the scientific method should be done throughout an experiment?

The scientific method that should be done throughout an experiment is to state the problem.


What physical evidence would scientists expect to find if evolution were true?

They would expect to find, and have found:Related species should be found in close proximity if they evolved from a single parent species, whereas a single act of Special Creation ought to have placed the species anywhere on the globe where the environment was suitableEvidence that the evolution of some species is consistent with known environmental changes, such as climatic changes or the gradual drift of the Galapagos Islands away from their volcanic source.Evidence for evolution in DNAConsistent evidence in the fossil record of new species replacing older species, with adaptationsAlthough there may have been a few catastrophic periods in the fossil record when large numbers of species suddenly became extinct (known as "Great Extinctions") many localised extinctions should also have occurred whenever species could no longer adapt to new challengesTransitional species in the fossil record, such as the recently discovered Odontochelys semitestacea, a newly identified species of turtle from 220-million years ago, that had a fully formed shell on its underside, but only a small partial shell on its back, extending from its backbone.


Why is evolution reffered to as a theory?

I don't exactly know why evolutionists refer to it as a theory, but I do know this. A theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning. According to the definition of a theory, evolution is not a theory. Evolution cannot be based on observation. No one was here to observe it. So evolution should be classified as a hypothesis not a theory. It is only a guess as to how things came about.


Evolution occurs and is not just a theory?

Some people believe in it while others do not. Belief itself is irrelevant. The theory could be true or false regardless of how many people believe or disbelieve. I personally accept it as accurate due to the evidence that the fossil record and DNA gives us but many Christians (and those of other religious beliefs) believe that to say that Evolution is real is to deny that God created everything. There are those who believe that God created evolution. Evolution is a theory but in science terms a theory is a widely accepted (by scientists) explanation supported by data. The evidence evolution occurs runs rampant through the genetic code of modern species and through the fossil record. Compare the earliest amphibians to sarcopterygian lungfish. Considered legged cetaceans. Examine the human chromosome that is a fused pair of "monkey: chromosomes. Contemplate the GULO gene. Why should we share a defective gene for the synthesis of ascorbic acid with old world monkeys? These are all strong indicators evolution has occurred, though the theory of evolution is the explanation that ties these facts into a coherent picture.


What should be observe in making and use of rubrics?

what should be observe in making and use of scoring rubrics


What should be observe in making and using rubrics?

what should be observe in making and use of scoring rubrics


What are some quotes about evolution?

"The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages…indeed our inability even in our imagination to construct functional intermediaries...has been a persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic accounts of evolution".[It should be noted that this has been removed from context; the passage then continues to explain the difference between gradualistic evolution and punctuated equilibrium. It does not imply that fossil records question evolution, but that it does question the earlier model of it.]Evolution is not only under attack by fundamentalist Christians, but is also being questioned by reputable scientists. Among paleontologists, scientists who study the fossil record, there is growing dissent from the prevailing view of Darwinism.", James Gorman, "The Tortoise or the Hare?", Discover, October 1980, p. 88.r. Steven Stanley, in Macroevolution: Pattern and Process, 1979, declared that "The known fossil record fails to document a single example of Phyletic evolution accomplishing a major morphologic transition..."Paleontologist Miles Eldredge admits that, "…paleontologists have said that the history of life supports gradual change, all the while knowing that it does not".T. L. Moor, in the periodical Pro-Evolution, Vol. 22, p.22, stated: "The more one studies paleontology, the more certain one becomes that evolution is based on faith alone".David Pilbeam, in an article found in Pro-Evolution, Vol. 14, p.127, says: "...in my own subject of paleoanthropology the "theory" heavily influenced by implicit ideas, almost always dominates data ... ideas that are totally unrelated to actual fossils have dominated theory building, which in turn strongly influences the way fossils are interpreted".


What is burning of fossil fuel?

We should not burn fossil fuels.


Where is the triceara fossil on fossil fighter?

It should be in Coldfeet Glaciar