somebody answer the qustieon
No, as far as putting troops on the ground,however they where part of NATO
During World War I, French troops famously refused to fight in the Battle of Verdun in 1916 due to the extreme conditions and heavy casualties. This reluctance was part of a broader context of mutinies and discontent among French soldiers, particularly following the 1917 Nivelle Offensive, where many felt disillusioned and demoralized by the leadership and the war's stalemate. The refusal to fight highlighted the growing fatigue and resistance among the troops amidst the grueling trench warfare.
Lithuania did fight in World War 2 but it was part of Russia.
They are mature gorillas and lead their troops .
there is no specific part of the world that produces silver
Egypt's role in WW1 wasn't very important, but did give the British a very large encampment in Egypt. This allowed the British to move troops on the Eastern Front to fight the Central powers.
Canada contributed many troops to the war. The Battle of Vimy Ridge was also a decisive victory for the Canadian troops in World War I.
The Australian troops helped the US troops stop Adolf Hitler from ruling the world.
Alfred Edward Gaby fought in world war 1 in either France or Germany i am not sure which specific part of world war one but i know that he was in world war one hope i helped (:
Israel was part of the Persian Empire but was not required to field troops with the Persian forces as they did not meet the standards of the army or navy.
If China sent troops south in WWII, it's because they were part of the allies during WWII.
powers of president to send troops in any [part of the world