No star itself could support life, but a planet around a star like our own and as far away as Earth may have some sort of life on it.
Betelgeuse is a red supergiant star with a high mass and unstable nature, making it unlikely to support life as we know it. Its intense radiation, strong stellar winds, and eventual explosive end as a supernova would not provide a stable environment for life to exist.
No. No. A thousand times no.
Saturn cannot support life. a hydrogen and helium atmosphere cant support life. then theres the radiation factor too.
To pinch a phrase from Star Trek, the answer would be 'It's Life Jim, but not as we know it'.
It is extremely unlikely that Ceres could support life.
Europa
no the moon cannot support life because it has little oxygen so nothing could live there
That would be the sun. It is a star and provides the light and warmth required to support life and flowing water.
That would be the sun. It is a star and provides the light and warmth required to support life and flowing water.
That would be the sun. It is a star and provides the light and warmth required to support life and flowing water.
No. Life cannot exist on a star; stars are far too hot to support life. There are no known planets in the Polaris system and the output from Polaris A is probably too variable for a stable environment.
Highly unlikely