Want this question answered?
Displacement and acceleration are zero at the instant the mass passes through its "rest" position ... the place where it sits motionless when it's not bouncing. Velocity is zero at the extremes of the bounce ... where the expansion and compression of the spring are maximum, and the mass reverses its direction of motion.
First picture wave motion--the wave starts at the middle, rises upwards to its crest, then downward, past the middle until reaching the extreme bottom, the trough. A spring follows the same motion pattern. When a spring is in equilibrium, there is no motion, the spring is at the middle point. If you were to start motion on the spring by vibrating the mass, the spring would be displaced from equilibrium. Picture the spring moving past the middle, to the left until in cannot be compressed any further (like the crest) and moves the other way. It will then pass the middle point and extend as far is it can (like the trough) before being pulled back towards the middle. This process will repeat until equilibrium is re-established. It will look very similar to wave motion, identical if a ideal spring were used (a spring where all energy is conserved).
its is the motion in which acceleration is directly proportion to the displacement from a fix point and always directed towards the center
Inertia is an objects ability to resist motion. I think of inertia as an object's' mass (different from weight). Newton's second law (F = mass times acceleration) describes the interaction between force and an objects ability to resist motion.
Get a screen door spring. and then hang a mass on it. Carefully lift it and then let it drop, that gives it up and down motion. Stop the mass, twist it, and then let it go - torsional mode. Stop it and pull it to one side. Now you have a paraconic pendulum. If it's stopped, and you hold the spring where the mass is attached to the spring, turning the mass level (90 degrees from spring axis) counteracts gravity, and the mass will rotate about its center of gravity. Perhaps the spring alone can oscillate. Hold the mass where the spring is attached, and pluck it in the middle If you're not careful in your release, any or all of these can happen at the same time. Since any and all can happen at the same time, then if I counted right, that's 720 modes already.
Displacement and acceleration are zero at the instant the mass passes through its "rest" position ... the place where it sits motionless when it's not bouncing. Velocity is zero at the extremes of the bounce ... where the expansion and compression of the spring are maximum, and the mass reverses its direction of motion.
First picture wave motion--the wave starts at the middle, rises upwards to its crest, then downward, past the middle until reaching the extreme bottom, the trough. A spring follows the same motion pattern. When a spring is in equilibrium, there is no motion, the spring is at the middle point. If you were to start motion on the spring by vibrating the mass, the spring would be displaced from equilibrium. Picture the spring moving past the middle, to the left until in cannot be compressed any further (like the crest) and moves the other way. It will then pass the middle point and extend as far is it can (like the trough) before being pulled back towards the middle. This process will repeat until equilibrium is re-established. It will look very similar to wave motion, identical if a ideal spring were used (a spring where all energy is conserved).
His Second Law.
The Spring Loaded Inverted Pendulum (SLIP) model is an attempt at describing running motion through a spring-mass model. The SLIP model is depicted as an energy conserving system with a point mass as the body and a massless spring as the leg and foot.
its is the motion in which acceleration is directly proportion to the displacement from a fix point and always directed towards the center
I'm going to say they're the same because they're vibrating and then I'm going to slowly walk away.
The statement is not scientifically accurate. A rolling stone, like any other object with mass, has mass. Mass is a measure of the amount of matter in an object, and it is always present regardless of whether the object is at rest or in motion.
Inertia is an objects ability to resist motion. I think of inertia as an object's' mass (different from weight). Newton's second law (F = mass times acceleration) describes the interaction between force and an objects ability to resist motion.
No, but they are related. Density = mass / volume. Mass is often informally called the "amount of substance".It can be measured by its gravitational effects (mass in kilograms or pounds, actually any 'weight'),or by its inertia (the resistance of any physical object to a change in its state of motion or rest. It is represented numerically by an object's mass).Better statement would be:Density is a measure of how much mass is in a certain volume of a particular substance.
The relationship between mass and motion is given by Newton's Second Law.
Any media form can provide content that is worthy or that panders to the worst in human nature.
it's equal to the difference between atomic number and atomic mass number