You did not give us any following statements.
the improvement in productivity in early agricultural societies enabled more complex societies to develop
A statement like "Ancient American civilizations developed complex societies primarily due to their interactions with other cultures" expresses a historical theory rather than a fact. This assertion interprets the reasons behind the development of these civilizations and suggests a causal relationship, which is subject to debate and interpretation. In contrast, factual statements would simply describe known aspects of these civilizations, such as their agricultural practices or architectural achievements.
Civilizations have advantages
An analogous statement is a statement comparing two or more things in an analogy.ex: Horses are to old societies, as cars are to present societies.
Floodwaters, impact, early river civilizations.
They were bustling with economic and cultural activity.
Soldiers who sailed to the Americas and defeated powerful civilizations, including the Aztecs and Inca.
Women were expected to dedicate their lives to their families.
This statement is generally not accurate. Industrial societies typically have a larger environmental impact due to their high levels of resource consumption and pollution. Nomadic societies often have sustainable practices that allow them to live in harmony with the environment, such as moving to new areas when resources are depleted.
It was mainly on inequalities of both male and female.
(Apex Learning) While all societies use natural resources, they do not use them in the same way.
Both civilizations suffered devastating losses through exposure to European diseases.... ( I didn't do much research this time but pervious question we already agree with this statement and I did one Google search to make sure.)