0
Micro evolution refers to small-scale changes in gene frequencies within a population over a short period of time, while macro evolution involves large-scale changes that result in the formation of new species over long periods of time. Both processes involve genetic variation and natural selection, but the difference lies in the scale and time frame of the changes observed.
What else can I help you with?
Is it true that random mating leads to micro-evolution?
Yes, random mating can contribute to micro-evolution by altering allele frequencies within a population over time. It introduces genetic variation, which can drive evolution through mechanisms like genetic drift and gene flow.
What is true of macro-evolution?
It is true that speciation occurs. Since macro-evolution is defined as evolution at and above the species level, this makes the statement that macro-evolution occurs an independently verifiable fact.It is also true that in biology we find nested hierarchies at every level - both at the range of observation from the molecular to the morphological, and at the range of groups from the single species to life-kind in general. This is precisely what we would expect if common descent were true not just within the genus, but for all known life.Furthermore, it is true that we find morphological intermediates in the fossil record: forms that are intermediate morphologically between basal clades in the nested hierarchies of life and clades derived from those basal clades. A basal clade is a group of organisms linked by shared features; a derived clade is a group within that larger group that shares all those features, but is also linked by a distinct set of features present only within that smaller group. An example of this is the basal clade of Apes, and the derived clade of Great Apes, between which exists, for instance the transitional form Pierolapithecus catalaunicus. This, again, is exactly what we would expect to find if macro-evolution were not just true for minor taxa (eg. within a genus), but for all taxa, throughout time.There are many statements about macro-evolution that have been verified through observation. The complete list of possible truths about macro-evolution is too large to detail in a single answer.
What is true Individuals are constantly evolving. Populations are constantly evolving. Evolution involves descent with modification. Acquired characteristics lead to evolution.?
Individuals are constantly evolving - False. Populations are constantly evolving - True. Evolution involves descent with modification - True. Acquired characteristics lead to evolution - False.
Which of the following is a true statement concerning genetic variation?
If you know your genetics, you can adjust your lifestyle to lower your risk of hereditary diseases.
Is this statement true or false Darwin's theory of evolution changed the way biologists thought about classification?
True. Darwin's theory of evolution emphasized the concept of common ancestry and drove biologists to consider evolutionary relationships when classifying organisms. This led to the development of the modern classification system based on evolutionary principles.
Is this statement true or false evolution involves descent with modification?
True.
Macroeconomics looks at the whole economy.?
True
Is it true that random mating leads to micro-evolution?
Yes, random mating can contribute to micro-evolution by altering allele frequencies within a population over time. It introduces genetic variation, which can drive evolution through mechanisms like genetic drift and gene flow.
What is true of macro-evolution?
It is true that speciation occurs. Since macro-evolution is defined as evolution at and above the species level, this makes the statement that macro-evolution occurs an independently verifiable fact.It is also true that in biology we find nested hierarchies at every level - both at the range of observation from the molecular to the morphological, and at the range of groups from the single species to life-kind in general. This is precisely what we would expect if common descent were true not just within the genus, but for all known life.Furthermore, it is true that we find morphological intermediates in the fossil record: forms that are intermediate morphologically between basal clades in the nested hierarchies of life and clades derived from those basal clades. A basal clade is a group of organisms linked by shared features; a derived clade is a group within that larger group that shares all those features, but is also linked by a distinct set of features present only within that smaller group. An example of this is the basal clade of Apes, and the derived clade of Great Apes, between which exists, for instance the transitional form Pierolapithecus catalaunicus. This, again, is exactly what we would expect to find if macro-evolution were not just true for minor taxa (eg. within a genus), but for all taxa, throughout time.There are many statements about macro-evolution that have been verified through observation. The complete list of possible truths about macro-evolution is too large to detail in a single answer.
In comparing a desert to a Marsh which statement is not true?
dis dick
If God made the world who made evolution?
AnswerThe answer is Man. This is because evolution is man's attempt to answer questions about creation and origins without reference to God the Creator by instead making a god and calling it Evolution ( sometimes called 'Nature'.)To help understand this, there are two forms of evolution: Micro-evolution and Macro-evolution. Micro-evolution refers to small changes in a creature, or inter-speciel changes, while macro-evolution refers to giant changes from one creature into another, or intra-speciel changes.An example of micro-evolution are seen in cats, with their fur growing longer and thicker for cold climates, and thinner for hot climates: this can be seen in the hairy Persian cat and the hairless Egyptian cat. Micro-evolution undoubtedly occurs.Macro-evolution is the supposed change of one species into another different species altogether eg monkeys to man, fish to mammals etc. Examples of macro-evolution are not seen, except in the imagination of man attempting to explain how things came about without God.Since macro-evolution is the transformation of one species into another completely different one, you would expect there to be transitional stages on the way: no transitional species have ever been found to support the idea of macro-evolution. Micro-evolution does occur in species and is true and valid, but it is usually then used to, quite falsely, 'prove' that macro-evolution must occur. Macro-evolution is only a concept, an idea, a process which is unproven and unprovable: it is not the means of the formation of matter in the first place. The question of origins is one evolutionists refuse to honestly face: it is hypocritical of them to to say on the one hand that scientists are right when they talk about origins, which is properly a theological matter, and then to say that religious people can't talk about science because they will be wrong. The question of origins is wholly theological and not scientific , and this also makes theistic evolution just another attempt to explain away creation by having a bet each way.Answer:We humans create things in accordance to our intelligence. As our intelligence improve so are our creations. We restructure our old creations. We term it evolution. If God created the world, would He not improve it? God created all things to grow, develop and become better. He did not create them to be stagnant. That process of becoming better is called evolution. Evolution is still a part of creation. If we deny creation, we deny every human birth. If we deny evolution, we do not have the right to become better. If we separate the two then we have not really learned anything.Answer:I do believe that evolution is very possible, but not to the extent that so many believe. It is common sense that if a random genetic mutation occurs which helps an animal to survive, that this trait would be passed on because the organism would be able to survive longer and therefore reproduce more. But, I do believe that life was set in motion by God.
is this statement true or false BC?
If the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then "This statement is false" is true, making the statement false. But if the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then... It's one of the biggest paradoxes ever, just like saying, "I'm lying right now."
What is circular logic?
Circular logic would be a statement or series of statements that are true because of another statement, which is true because of the first. For example, statement A is true because statement B is true. Statement B is true because statement A is true
Why is evolution a loaded word?
Evolution can be a loaded word because it can create tension (or at least the feeling of it) between people with difference beliefs. Not everyone believes Evolution is true (the Evolution here is macro-evolution, where life started with simple organisms and evolved into more complex creatures.) The word Evolution can create relativity strong feelings, especially if someone who doesn't believe it is being told it is true, or if someone who does believe it is being told it is false. Just because the word Evolution can be loaded does not always mean it is. It is possible to use the word among people with different beliefs and not create emotional tension.
What is a statement that is true only if both parts of the statement are true?
In computing, this is an AND statement.
What is a true statement that combines a true conditional statement and is its true converse?
always true
What is a true statement that combines a true conditional statement and its true converse?
always true
