answersLogoWhite

0

A whole lot of power!

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Did the roman emperors have political power?

The Roman emperors were the absolute rulers of the Roman Empire. Power wasconcentratedin their hands and they empowered to make all the decisions.


What was not a power held by Rome's emperors?

The Roman emperors were absolute rulers. They power was absolute.


What power did Augustus bring romes emperors?

Augustus established his personal absolute power and made himself the first Roman emperor. Therefore, he started the period of absolute power by emperors which replaced the Roman Republic.


How many roman emperors were there in total?

In total there were 178 Roman emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total there were 178 Roman emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total there were 178 Roman emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total there were 178 Roman emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total there were 178 Roman emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total there were 178 Roman emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total there were 178 Roman emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total there were 178 Roman emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total there were 178 Roman emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.


What powers did roman emperors have?

The Roman emperors had a lot of power. They were the leaders of Rome because they had so much power.If you argued with the emperor or disobeyed his/her order you would be executed.


What power did emperors have?

The Roman emperors had a lot of power. They were the leaders of Rome because they had so much power.If you argued with the emperor or disobeyed his/her order you would be executed.


Were roman empereurs born to role?

No, Roman emperors were not 'born to rule'. Succession had no clear order and many emperors took power by force as opposed to birth. In Roman society, such actions were considered normal with the belief that the most able would take power.


Why was Diocletian called Augustus during his rule of the eastern territory of the Roman Empire?

Augustus was a title of Roman emperors which was added to the man's name.Augustus was a title of Roman emperors which was added to the man's name.Augustus was a title of Roman emperors which was added to the man's name.Augustus was a title of Roman emperors which was added to the man's name.Augustus was a title of Roman emperors which was added to the man's name.Augustus was a title of Roman emperors which was added to the man's name.Augustus was a title of Roman emperors which was added to the man's name.Augustus was a title of Roman emperors which was added to the man's name.Augustus was a title of Roman emperors which was added to the man's name.


What did a Roman emperor do?

hope this helps: The roman emperor lead the country and took contol in making the difficult decisions. they helped keep the the country in order. They made laws and kept the country at peace.


How holy roman emperors came into power?

They came to power when Charlemagne was crowned as emperor and defender of Christianity by the pope.


What are emperors powers?

The powers of an emperor depend on what type of empire he heads. Most modern emperors are constitutional monarchs and really have very little actual power, as the power is concentrated in the hands of the people. The ancient emperors, such as the Roman and Chinese emperors, had unlimited powers and unlimited authority.


Why did the roman emperors use art?

The Roman emperors were not different from the emperors and kings of antiquity and the Middle Ages. Personal rules used art to display their wealth and status and help legitimise of strengthen their image of power by creating artistic symbols for their power. It was often a matter of propaganda. Power and wealth was what patronised the arts. This was not limited to personal rulers. Members of the aristocracies and the wealthy middle classes did the same. This is one of the reasons why there was so much art of the Italian Renaissance. There were plenty of personal rulers, aristocrats and wealthy merchants and bankers in the Italian city-states who wanted to display their wealth and create symbolism for their power.