Want this question answered?
No, Julius Caesar did not improve the Roman Empire because it did not exist at the time. Julius Caesar lived during the period of the Roman Republic.Julius Caesar did make improvements to the political structure of the Republic - in an attempt to unify the provinces and avoid another civil war. He also made other reforms, such as the introduction of a debt restructuring law and the Julian calendar. This resulted in a reduction in debt and a less chaotic calendar, both of which helped improve the Republic.
when an emperor died it was obvious that their was a succesion dispute between his sons and was one of the major reason for the decline of the mughals to.when humayun felt ill all his sons broke out fighting for the throne even humayun had not died .it was to avoid such a costly battle that aurangzeb divided his empire between his sons but he was not succesful and all his sons fought and destroyed th strength of the empire
at arm's length in order to avoid another war
to avoid a civil war over the issue of slavery
The invention of the cotton gin actually revived a dying slavery demand.
Settling the civil war. Organising the political structure to avoid a recurrence. Keeping control of the army to avoid ambitious generals rebelling. Stabilising the borders of the empire. Promoting prosperity.
The senate could not do much to avoid the 12 civil wars in the Late Roman Republic. It could not stop strong military commanders who had the loyalty of their troops from fighting each other. Moreover, in the first few of these wars, it sided with one of the fighting factions, that of the conservative commander. In one of them, the senate was actually one of the fighting forces. This was Caesar's civil war against the forces of the senate. The Liberators' Civil War was fought between supporters of the senate and supporters of the assassinated Julius Caesar.
Not enough information to answer. Avoid WHAT KIND of civil lawsuit? General answer would have to be - NO.
Attempts to avoid civil war between the two sections - the slave-owning South and the free-soil North.
Between 1935 and 1937, the United States Congress passed the Neutrality Acts to avoid another incident like Lusitania. The reaction was negative, as it did not make a clear distinction between aggressor and victim.
they did not want to die
No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.
Soldiers were obtained in the Civil War by volunteering and later the draft. In the South, any able-bodied male between the ages of 17 and 50 could be drafted. In the North, between ages 17 and 25. A Southerner could avoid the draft by owning at least twenty slaves. A Northerner could avoid the draft by paying the government $300. For this reason, the Civil War became known as "The rich man's war, poor man's fight".
No. Bankruptcy is a civil act.
You should keep a good look out in order to avoid colliding with another boat.
No, Julius Caesar did not improve the Roman Empire because it did not exist at the time. Julius Caesar lived during the period of the Roman Republic.Julius Caesar did make improvements to the political structure of the Republic - in an attempt to unify the provinces and avoid another civil war. He also made other reforms, such as the introduction of a debt restructuring law and the Julian calendar. This resulted in a reduction in debt and a less chaotic calendar, both of which helped improve the Republic.