0
What else can I help you with?
Which perspective focuses on the stigma that a defendant might acquire once he or she is convicted?
Nonintervention
Why would a lawyer suggest a plead of guilty to a misdemeanor when a person did not participate in the crime?
Because sometimes people are convicted of crimes even though they're actually innocent. If the defense attorney thinks that the prosecution has enough evidence to convict the defendant of a more severe crime, they might advise the defendant to plead guilty to a lesser crime, which might mean a much less severe punishment.
Defination of acquireanother word for acquire?
The definition of acquire is to buy or obtain for oneself. Another word for acquire might include obtain.
Why might a defense attorney not want to call the defendant to the stand to testify?
A defense attorney might choose not to call the defendant to the stand to avoid the risk of the defendant providing damaging testimony that could undermine their case. The defendant's credibility may be questioned, or they might inadvertently reveal information that could be detrimental to their defense. Additionally, the attorney may feel that the prosecution has not met its burden of proof, making the defendant's testimony unnecessary. Ultimately, the decision is strategic, focusing on the overall strength of the defense case.
Can the defendant see the evidence that is produced by a Motion of Discovery?
The defendant might not personally get to "see it," (except at trial) but his legal counsel certainly may.
When an innocent defendant accepts a plea offer does his pleading guilty constitute perjury?
A person who is innocent should never plead guilty or Nolo Contendre or make a deal with the proscecution. Once a plea bargain has been accepted the defendant loses all rights to appeal. Even probation indicates the person has been convicted of a crime and has a criminal record and can create problems throughout one's life. This might be a time for a truly innocent defendant to consider filing a motion that he or she was not adequately represented by legal counsel.
What are the pleadings filed by the plaintiff?
The defendant files an Answer to the Complaint. In the Answer, defendant responds to each allegation of the complaint, one by one, stating whether the defendant admits, denies or leaves plaintiff to his proofs as to each individual allegation. Also, a defendant might file a counter-claim, if defendant has an affirmative claim against plaintiff. A defendant might also file a cross-claim if defendant believes that some other person is responsible for plaintiff's damages.
What happens if defendant refuses to answer requests for admission or they answer but deny everything?
In some states, if a defendant refuses to admit to certain facts in a request for admissions, the defendant might have to pay the costs incurred by the other party in gathering evidence to prove those facts if the defendant had no reasonable basis for not admitting to them.
How has science helped those falsely convicted of crimes?
Many individuals are convicted each day. Science has been able to help those who have been falsely convicted of crimes by examining DNA evidence that might link them to the crime.
Which defense might a defendant use if the patients knew the inherent risk before treatment?
assumption of risk
Can a convicted felon live with a codefented?
Yes, a convicted felon can live with a co-defendant, but this situation may be subject to legal restrictions depending on the terms of their bail or sentencing. Courts might impose conditions that prevent co-defendants from associating with each other to avoid potential collusion or tampering with evidence. It's essential for both parties to be aware of and comply with any legal stipulations to avoid further legal complications. Always consult with a legal professional for specific guidance.
What if the defendant lied under oath?
That is called perjury and can lead to fine and/or imprisonment. It might also lead to a guilty verdict, if the jury thinks that the defendant is a liar and is probably guilty of the crime.Added: It would be up to the prosecutor to impeach the defendant and refute his version of affairs by the production of evidence and testimony to the contrary.
