answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)

The Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896) was a landmark case that upheld a Louisiana statute allowing for "equal but separate" facilities. The facilities in question were railway cars which were divided by partition and offered the same accommodations to white and "colored" races. It was found that these provisions were not in conflict with the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

At first, yes; however, the Court later concluded "separate but equal" is unconstitutional.

In Plessy v Ferguson, (1896), the US Supreme Court held "separate but equal" facilities were constitutional; however, they reversed their position 60 years later when the Warren Court declared the doctrine unconstitutional in public education, in Brown v. Board of Education, (1954).

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

It was legal as long as the African Americans had access to public facilities

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Jocelyn Martinez

Lvl 2
3y ago

Plessy v. Ferguson pretty sure

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

brown

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: This was a U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the legality of racial segregation so long as facilities were "separate but equal."?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What were the reasons behind the decision on the Plessy V Ferguson case decision?

The main reason behind the decision in the Plessy v. Ferguson case was the upheld legality of racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine. The Supreme Court ruled that as long as facilities and opportunities provided to African Americans were theoretically equal to those provided to whites, segregation was constitutional. This decision had significant implications for promoting racial discrimination and the perpetuation of Jim Crow laws in the United States.


What did the supreme court decide in Korematsu v. US?

The decision upheld the legality of the wartime internment policy


What did the supreme court decide in case korematsu v. US?

The decision upheld the legality of the wartime internment policy


What was the supreme courts decision in plessy v. Ferguson?

The Supreme Court decided "separate but equal" (i.e.,segregation) was constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment, as long as the facilities or accommodations were equal.More InformationIn Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), the U.S. Supreme Court decided that a Louisiana law, The Separate Car Act of 1890 (Act 111), requiring African-Americans and Caucasians to travel in separate railroad cars was constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause, as long as the accommodations provided for the African-Americans were equal to those provided for Whites.This validated the "separate but equal" doctrine whites used to avoid accepting African-Americans as peers, and allowed the proliferation of Jim Crow laws throughout the South. The decision validated segregation as legal.The ruling appeared to contradict a recent decision prohibiting segregation on trains traveling across state lines. In the earlier case, the Court invoked Congress' authority to regulate commerce between the states under the Constitution's Interstate Commerce Clause, not the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause. In Plessy, the Court upheld the Louisiana state courts' ruling by a vote of 7-1 (Justice Brewer took no part in the case; Justice John Marshall Harlan dissented).The precedent in Plessy v. Ferguson held until explicitly overturned by the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education, (1954)Case Citation:Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)it legalized the public segregation of blacks and whites


When was Legality Movement created?

Legality Movement was created in 1941.


If south was for slavery why were they fighting for states rights?

It is likely that they wished for each state to make the decision on the legality of slavery. That would be the proper 'state's rights' position for the period.


Why was Supreme Court justice Marshall's decision so important to the future of American politics?

US Supreme Justice John Marshall gave the majority decision in the Marbury v. Madison case. It was important because it established the legality of the procedure called judicial review. This allowed the Court to make proactive decisions on whether laws were constitutional or not. Previously the Court would be reactive, meaning it would decide cases brought to the court regarding constitutional matters.


When was Legality Movement Party created?

Legality Movement Party was created in 1924.


What are the illegal attempts vs legality of Hitler 1933?

illegal vs. legality


What is a short sentence for the word legality?

I intend to challenge the legality of his claim in the courts.


How did NAACP use a legal strategy to oppose segregation?

The NAACP used lawyers to oppose segregation. They used all types of historic details stating in great detail as to why they opposed segregation.They also used doctrinal analysis and political contexts in their argument.


Is legality a real word?

Yes, legality is a real word which means lawfulness or the state of being legal.