It's the present perfect tense.
'Had seen' is the past perfect tense.The present perfect tense would be 'have/has seen'.
No. When you say you have seen something, you are using present perfect tense.
Seen is the past participle of "see"
Seen is the past participle of see See- saw- seen
No, seen is the past participle. The simple past tense is saw.
The tense "has seen" is in the present perfect tense. It is formed by combining the present tense of the auxiliary verb "has" with the past participle "seen" of the main verb.
"Seen" is a past participle form of the verb "see." It is typically used in perfect tenses (e.g., she has seen) or as part of passive forms (e.g., the movie was seen by many people).
'Had seen' is the past perfect tense.The present perfect tense would be 'have/has seen'.
No. When you say you have seen something, you are using present perfect tense.
The phrase "is you seen" is not proper English grammar. It appears to be a grammatical error, as "is" is the present tense form of the verb "to be" and "seen" is the past participle form of "see." A correct phrasing could be "have you seen?" or "did you see?" depending on the context.
Seen in is not tense. The verb seen is the past participle of see but a past participle by itself does not make a tense.have/has seen = present perfecthad seen = past perfectwas seen = passive
Seen is the past participle of "see"
Yes, "seen" is the past participle form of the verb "see." It is commonly used in perfect tenses, passive voice, and as an adjective.
The present tense of "seen" is "see."
"Seen" is already the past participle of "see", and the past tense of "see" is "saw".
The past tense of "I have not seen your message" is "I had not seen your message."
seen