0
What term is used to describe those rights that all people are entitled to?
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is that mean these people are parasites?
parasites are animals which live off their hosts so it's used to describe those who never work but live off benefits for example.
What is the difference between divine rights and natural rights?
Divine right is where the king believes that he answers to god and god only and natural rights is the belief that everyone is born with the rights to life,liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Divine rights are those which allegedly come directly from a god, monarchs usually become monarchs due to these rights. Natural, or inalienable, rights are rights given to every person which do not have to be earned. They are defined by English philosopher John Locke as the right to "life, liberty and property." Thomas Jefferson called them in writing the United States Declaration of Independence the right to "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness."
What is Balancing the requirements of the developers with an ecosystem is known as?
It is the socialist term, sustainable development. Sustainable development sacrifices the private property rights of persons to the felt needs of the collective. By presenting the loss of property rights in a supposedly altruistic setting, those rights are slowly eaten away. Sustainability has been the slow encroachment of liberty as socialism has grown by hiding its true goals.
How do we define law?
the law gives rights to individuals and methods of enforcing those rights, Quite often law is involved in a balancing act, trying to ensure that one person's rights do not affect the other person's rights. in order to keep the balance the law also imposes duties on people law is for each an individuals, who is forced to follow it. law is for the benifit of ones self as well as for the country or nation.
What rights do citizens have in a monarchy?
It varies from country to country. Rights in a democratic state, whether a constitutional monarchy or a republic will tend to be roughly the same. While each is different, they all guarantee and affirm in their own way the basic rights set out in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: the freedoms of expression, conscience, assembly, association and movement; the rights to life and liberty; the right not to be subjected to torture or cruel and unusual punishment; and the right to a fair trial, due process and natural justice. Basically they would have the same rights as in a democratic parliamentary or democratic presidential republic - the rights of a Swede, Canadian or Briton (all living in constitutional monarchies) are similar to those of an US, French or Italian citizen (living in democratic republics). Beyond normal guarantees for individual rights (such as the right to life, property, welfare, freedom of expression, religion, right to information, interdiction of censorship etc. etc.), that are available, each citizen has a set of political rights (like in the US or France). Typically, those in constitutional monarchy elect the legislative body of the country (the parliament or congress or diet or whatever the said country chooses to call it), which in terms elects the executive (the largest party/the coalition of parties that get the majority gets to form a government), which is represented by a prime-minister (same as in the case of parliamentary republics). So, what the president does in the US (or in other presidential republics), the prime minister does in a parliamentary republic or a constitutional monarchy. The only difference between a constitutional monarchy and a parliamentary republic is that the nominal head of state is the king/queen, that is not elected, but that stands only as a figurehead, as an international image of the country (same as the pres. of the US, say) and as a rallying flag in times of trouble. Unlike the president of the US, a parliamentary president or a monarch has no say in the executive or legislative affairs of the country - they must fully obey the choice of the people through the parliament. Of course, the citizens are entitled to criticize the king/queen (newspapers here are full of criticism and/or gossip), and even, if they so choose, depose their monarch by means of a referendum and install a republic instead (for example, in Australia, some parties want that, and have called a referendum, but people chose that they want to be a monarchy for the future). So, in a nutshell, people in a constitutional monarchy have all the rights of people in a democratic presidential or parliamentary republic.
Why did people living in the colonies feel they were entitled to those rights?
Because they were annoying Jewsnipz!!
Who is entitled to subscribe to a Rights Issue?
Those who held shares at the time of book closure.
Why do you think those living in 13 colonies believe they were entitled to those rights?
Because They Way They Were Ruled And They Annoyed the Jews
why do you think those living in the 13 colonies believed they were entitled in those rights?
Because They Way They Were Ruled And They Annoyed the Jews
Why American colonists have the rights of Englishmen?
The American colonists were entitled to the rights of englishmen because they were an English colony. The abridgment of those rights was the cause of the revolutionary war.
Why did the American colonists have rights of englishmen?
The American colonists were entitled to the rights of englishmen because they were an English colony. The abridgment of those rights was the cause of the revolutionary war.
What is a character trait that can be used to describe a person who doesn't allow religious rights?
The adjective to describe those who don't allow religious rights is intolerant.
What are relative rights?
RELATIVE RIGHTS. Those to which a person is entitled in consequence of his relation with others such as the rights of a husband in relation to his wife; of a father, as to his children; of a master, as to his servant; of a guardian, as to his ward.
Why did the those living in the thirteen colonies believe they were entitled to the bill of rights?
Because they believed they should have a government speak for the colonists voice.
What term does the Declaration of Independence use to describe natural rights guaranteed to people naturally instead of by the law?
It refers to them as "inalienable rights" which are those human rights due everyone, regardless of their society or system of government. Inalienable means "cannot be given up to others."
What is people right in the constitutional rights?
the people right in the constitution is those rights what are given in for the individual liberty and freedom
What voting rights does the UK have?
Anyone of legal voting age is entitled to vote in local and general elections, provided they are registered, and listed on the electoral role. The only exception is people who are 'lawfully detained' (ie those in prison or mental institutions)
