Want this question answered?
theory
Yes. If evolution was not widely supported by evidence, then it would be regarded as a hypothesis rather than a theory.
It is a comprehensive explanatory body of well supported by the evidence concepts that go for in explaining the fact of evolution.
It is no longer Darwin's theory, as Darwin has been dead about 130 years. There are no credible alternatives to the modern theory of evolution by natural selection. So, the differences is; the theory of evolution by natural selection is supported by myriad lines of converging evidence and explains the natural phenomenon that is evolution very well. The " conflicting theories " have no evidence supporting them and explain nothing.
It is called a theory because they are well supported by observations and experimental evidence.
Out of Africa theory
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
Seafloor Spreading.
theory
Yes. If evolution was not widely supported by evidence, then it would be regarded as a hypothesis rather than a theory.
Modern evidence suggests that Homo sapiens originated in Africa and then migrated to other parts of the world around 60,000 years ago. This out-of-Africa theory is supported by genetic, fossil, and archaeological evidence.
A theory
Yes. If evolution was not widely supported by evidence, then it would be regarded as a hypothesis rather than a theory.
NO. take Darwin's theory of evolution for example. there is no real evidence, but it is accepted as fact by most in America today.
A theory becomes a fact when that theory is supported by experimental evidence.
The theory of evolution is not supported by incontrovertible evidence.
The evidence of cosmic microwave background radiation supports the Big Bang theory.