Very, very few. That doesn't make either one more correct than the other, mind. I've heard somewhere that NASA made a computer to calculate the age of the earth, and the computer generated an error because it was missing 1 day. It's explained that God (in the Bible) stopped time for a day for a battle (I think) to take place. But because one deals with the practical approach to matters, and the other with the spiritual, you won't see many similarities / things they agree on. People in comas have all told stories of being something else other than humans (experience what's like to be a worm, a butterfly ect) and in the end, look upon the universe and feel the presence of a great being most identifly as God. That's all I've got, I hope I've helped!
It doesn't.
They brought Christianity and knowledge of European science and technology, such as the clock.
yez
with science people began to question Christianity now that things could be explained through science rather than God. Nonbelievers began to develop.
New knowledge, particularly from scientific discoveries and historical research, often contradicted traditional religious beliefs held by Christian scholars. This challenged their worldview and forced them to reconcile new findings with their faith, leading to debates and tensions between religion and science.
No.
It is a social science, yes. But technically, isn't everything a science?
he included the science
He thought they were religion and science were integrally related.
If you are speaking of true science and not therretical science, then the Bible and science can agree. I have written article on SCIENCE AND THE SCRIPTURES and there is no disagreement between them.
In truth, it is a conspiracy. It is a conspiracy against intelligence. Perhaps a conspiracy against sanity. There is no secret, malevolent, construct of man that is organized against Christianity. Not even atheists can agree on how to address Christianity. For that matter, not even Christians can agree.
He felt bad