If , then, and because.
·
be well tested.
·
be widely accepted.
explain the observable facts.
The question must be testable, supportable, and repeatable.
Such a person would have to meet three requirements: 1) Publishes articles in peer reviewed scientific journals. 2) Religious or not, he/she doesn't concern him/herself with creationism. 3) Objects to evolution. I know of people who publish scientific articles and aren't religious/creationists - but they don't object to evolution. I know of people who publish scientific articles and object to evolution (though not simultaneously) - but they are creationists. I know of people who object to evolution but are not creationists - however they don't publish. I know of no people who meet all three criteria.
They had to meet a certain standard for production time.
Usually a new idea or even a different angle on a commonly held theory will be submitted for peer review, that is a scientist will submit their findings to a major scientific journal such as Nature, etc. Various scientists will then read, discuss, dissect, question the proposal for accuracy or feasibility.
A vertex is where two lines of the shape meet. For example, the three points on a triangle are called vertices.
Astrology, including horoscopes, is considered a pseudoscience by the scientific community. Pseudoscience is a belief or process that claims to be based on scientific principles but lacks empirical evidence, consistent methodology, and refutation, making it inherently unscientific. Here are some reasons why astrology, including horoscopes, is not considered scientifically valid: Lack of empirical evidence: Scientific theories and concepts are supported by extensive empirical evidence obtained through controlled experiments, observations, and measurements. Astrology does not meet this standard; Its principles are not supported by scientific evidence. Unforgeability: Scientific theories are formulated so that they can be tested and potentially disproved by experiments or observations. Astrology often relies on vague or ambiguous interpretations, making it difficult to objectively verify or falsify its claims.
can u help me
What conditions did the British expect Zionists to meet?
The concept of this question is backwards. The question implies that somehow the arctic ecosystem has designed itself to meet the needs of the plants and animals that live there. The arctic (or any other ecosystem) does not and cannot do this. The question is (or should be) "How have the plants and animals that live in the arctic adapted to survive in under those conditions?"
8 cubed is 512 - which meets the conditions of the question. Of course if you don't restrict it to integers, any number from about 7.368 to about 8.434 will also meet the conditions.
three years ago i meet him.
If you meet the conditions of the pardon.
Their destinies collided as they were fated to meet.
There are three meet the parents meet the fockers and little fockers
The question should be,''What does tom cruise have to do to meet you?''
The point where all three angle bisectors meet is the centre of the incircle - the circle which touches all the sides of the triangle (alternatively described as the circle for which the sides of the triangle are tangents).
The Three Stooges Meet Hercules was created on 1962-01-26.
A gold bar must meet the standard conditions of manufacture, labeling, and record keeping. A gold bar is then measured by the scale of troy ounces to determine its value.