Tell them to pound sand and report them to the Better Business Bureau. Unless oh course it is a bad check or fraud or something that you have done that is criminal, but just for a late bill or a bill that you never paid. In the United States we have NO debtors prisons. This comes from English Common Law in which they did have debtors prisons.
When we won our independence from England in our Constitution we purposely made no provisions for a debtors as criminals only civil provisions.
Yes, a security interest can affect arrest in certain legal contexts, particularly in civil cases involving debt collection. If a creditor has a security interest in a debtor's property, they may have the right to seize that property to satisfy a debt, which can sometimes lead to an arrest if the debtor attempts to hide or destroy the secured assets. However, in criminal law, security interests do not typically influence the process of arrest, which is based on evidence of a crime rather than financial obligations.
Texas, Florida, Iowa, Nevada
No - while you are financially obligated, the United States does not have debtor's prison. Any collection agency which threatens a debtor with arrest is in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and can be sued by the debtor for damage awards of up to $1k per violation. A judge may also award additional damages based upon the severity of the violations (a man was recently awarded a multi million dollar lawsuit against a collection agency which screamed racial obscenities to him - and he didn't even owe them money).
A judgment debtor's exam is a process that allows a judgment creditor (anyone who is owed money by order of a court) to make the debtor answer questions about his or her assets, like jewelry, cars, stocks, bank accounts, valuable Nascar memorabilia, etc. If you get served with an order to appear for a judgment debtor's exam, you better show up or call the attorney listed on the notice. If you fail to appear, you could have a warrant issued for your arrest.
None. A creditor can continue collection actions (including a lawsuit) against a debtor regardless of where the creditor is located or the debtor resides.
5
The term refers to a state's laws that appear to offer a debtor who defaults on financial commitments more protection against creditors. The definition of such would depend upon the type of debts, the circumstances of those debt(s) and how the laws relate to his or her situtation. FYI, There are no community property states that could be defined as "debtor friendly".
A debtor state is a state that will not garnish wages or place leans on homes in the case of unpaid debts/bills ! There is not such a thing as a "debtor state" there are states that are considered "debtor friendly" rather than "creditor friendly" meaning that the states have existing laws that favor the debtor rather than the creditor when it relates to bankruptcy and lawsuits for monies owed. This does not necessarily mean that wages cannot be garnished, assets cannot be seized nor liens placed against real property, it simply means the debtor can sometimes avoid such action or can protect a large portion of his or her real and personal property.
Evading arrest is known as a felony in most states. It can have severe penalties.
They may. Arrest warrants are valid for all states and all US dependencies.
It sounds like you may be referring to a so-called "citizens arrest' wherein (in some states) citizens are empowered to arrest perpetrators observed committing felony crimes.
It is illegal for anyone to threaten anyone with jail time. However, repossession drivers may as a rule warn debtors that if they do not surrender the vehicle that the potential for arrest exists. This is not a threat. Many lenders will automatically authorize the petition of replevin when a debtor refuses to cooperate. If a replevin is served on a debtor and that debtor refuse to surrender the vehicle, he is likely to be arrested, and held until he surrenders the vehicle, or a judge is satisfied with the time the debtor serves for contempt of his order.