A microscopic would help you better examine an organism.
Year, make, model, engine and a detailed description of which pulley locked up would help us help you.
You continue to make it repeatedly, with measurements of several kinds if possible, and you enlist the help of several others to make the same observation repeatedly and with measurements.
Most of the time they write down what they are going to do, what they think will happen judging on what they are using. Then they go from there
Sand and gravel soil grains can be viewed without a magnifying glass. Silt and clay are visible to the naked eye but would require varying degrees of magnification to make detailed observation.
I analyze the evidence collected to draw conclusions and make connections. By examining patterns, relationships, and trends, I can reveal insights and provide explanations that help clarify the observation.
Yes, you can make detailed estimates of populations with the help of computers.
observation of heterogenous?
Being specific and detailed in what you observe. Making notes or recordings of your observations for future reference. Keeping biases and assumptions in check to maintain objectivity.
A simple way to describe this would be, an observation is what you see, and an interpretation is what you conclude about what you have seen. OR An observation is a fact, something your senses detect happening while an interpretation is what you make of it by what you have sensed with your senses.
The scientific process that involves using the five senses is observation. Through observation, scientists gather information about the world around them by using sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell to collect data and make detailed records of their findings.
no because how can you make an inference without making an observation
Meaning depends on context and audience. For instance, you could make the observation that President Obama is black but this would be a pointless observation since most people already know it. In fact the observation is so obvious the president used it as a joke on a late night TV channel.So for an observation to be meaningful it needs to be pertinent, relevant, timely, precise and accurate.If we are trying to launch a vehicle into space and you note that the acceleration constant for the earth's gravity had changed by 1percent. This would be startling, timely, and maybe even alarming. If it turned out that the measurement was not repeatable the observation would be not be meaningful. It would probably just be annoying.For the most part in science, the most meaningful observations are repeatable.