answersLogoWhite

0

The Romans had civil trials, criminal trials and treason trials.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Did the emperor make the decisions at ancient roman trails?

An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.


Why did Justinian wanted his empire to be like the roman empire?

Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.


Who was the Roman emporer that divided the Roman empire?

Diocletian was the emperor who divided the Roman empire.Diocletian was the emperor who divided the Roman empire.Diocletian was the emperor who divided the Roman empire.Diocletian was the emperor who divided the Roman empire.Diocletian was the emperor who divided the Roman empire.Diocletian was the emperor who divided the Roman empire.Diocletian was the emperor who divided the Roman empire.Diocletian was the emperor who divided the Roman empire.Diocletian was the emperor who divided the Roman empire.


What was the last Roman Emperor?

The last Roman emperor in the west was overthrown in 476 and the last Roman emperor of the east, in 1453.The last Roman emperor in the west was overthrown in 476 and the last Roman emperor of the east, in 1453.The last Roman emperor in the west was overthrown in 476 and the last Roman emperor of the east, in 1453.The last Roman emperor in the west was overthrown in 476 and the last Roman emperor of the east, in 1453.The last Roman emperor in the west was overthrown in 476 and the last Roman emperor of the east, in 1453.The last Roman emperor in the west was overthrown in 476 and the last Roman emperor of the east, in 1453.The last Roman emperor in the west was overthrown in 476 and the last Roman emperor of the east, in 1453.The last Roman emperor in the west was overthrown in 476 and the last Roman emperor of the east, in 1453.The last Roman emperor in the west was overthrown in 476 and the last Roman emperor of the east, in 1453.


Why have tribunals been established?

The first recorded instances were in the days of the Roman Empire. So named because these hearings/trials were conducted in front of a Roman Tribune, a government official appointed by the Emperor.


Which Roman Emperor was the worst?

Emperor Nero was the worst roman emperor ever known in the roman empire.


Who forced the last Roman Emperor in the west to abdicate?

Odoacer forced the last Roman emperor of the west to abdicate.Odoacer forced the last Roman emperor of the west to abdicate.Odoacer forced the last Roman emperor of the west to abdicate.Odoacer forced the last Roman emperor of the west to abdicate.Odoacer forced the last Roman emperor of the west to abdicate.Odoacer forced the last Roman emperor of the west to abdicate.Odoacer forced the last Roman emperor of the west to abdicate.Odoacer forced the last Roman emperor of the west to abdicate.Odoacer forced the last Roman emperor of the west to abdicate.


How was the holy roman emperor power limited?

The Roman emperor had to answer to the pope.


How old is a Roman Emperor?

he age of a Roman emperor depended on how old he was when he was proclaimed emperor


What year was the last Roman Emperor?

The last Roman emperor in the west was overthrown in 476 and the last Roman emperor of the east, in 1453.The last Roman emperor in the west was overthrown in 476 and the last Roman emperor of the east, in 1453.The last Roman emperor in the west was overthrown in 476 and the last Roman emperor of the east, in 1453.The last Roman emperor in the west was overthrown in 476 and the last Roman emperor of the east, in 1453.The last Roman emperor in the west was overthrown in 476 and the last Roman emperor of the east, in 1453.The last Roman emperor in the west was overthrown in 476 and the last Roman emperor of the east, in 1453.The last Roman emperor in the west was overthrown in 476 and the last Roman emperor of the east, in 1453.The last Roman emperor in the west was overthrown in 476 and the last Roman emperor of the east, in 1453.The last Roman emperor in the west was overthrown in 476 and the last Roman emperor of the east, in 1453.


Where did Tranjan rule?

If you mean Trajan, he was a Roman emperor and he ruled in Rome.If you mean Trajan, he was a Roman emperor and he ruled in Rome.If you mean Trajan, he was a Roman emperor and he ruled in Rome.If you mean Trajan, he was a Roman emperor and he ruled in Rome.If you mean Trajan, he was a Roman emperor and he ruled in Rome.If you mean Trajan, he was a Roman emperor and he ruled in Rome.If you mean Trajan, he was a Roman emperor and he ruled in Rome.If you mean Trajan, he was a Roman emperor and he ruled in Rome.If you mean Trajan, he was a Roman emperor and he ruled in Rome.


What did Marcus aurelius do for a living?

Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor. He ruled the empire for a living.Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor. He ruled the empire for a living.Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor. He ruled the empire for a living.Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor. He ruled the empire for a living.Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor. He ruled the empire for a living.Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor. He ruled the empire for a living.Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor. He ruled the empire for a living.Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor. He ruled the empire for a living.Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor. He ruled the empire for a living.