0
What two pieces of evidence did van Helmont use to reach his conclusion?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Roughly the same amount of dried soil (kg) was weighted at the start, and five years later. Also, he only gave the plants water, and nothing else.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is inductive reasoning moves from what to what?
The use of a specific observation to reach a general conclusion. (APEX)
What is a conclusion as to the nature of an illness is called?
Diagnosis"To treat a patient, a physician mush first make a diagnosis, that is, reach a conclusion as to the nature or identity of the illness." Memmler's The Human Body in Health and Disease, 11th ed
Paul Ehrlich wrote that only alkaline disinfectants would be effective against Mycobacterium How did he reach this conclusion?
I would guess that if a bacterium is acid fast, then Ehrlich thought an alkaline might destroy it.
Which of these is most clearly an advantage of synthesizing claims and evidence in a group discussion?
because he was such a marginal player but was on several Super Bowl-winning teams, it’s possible that harper let success go to his head.
What noticeable trend from this graph might be used to make a conclusion?
Average plant height increases with an increase in the concentration of sodium phosphate until the plants reach a maximum possible height.
What kind of reasoning moves from general to specific facts in order to reach conclusion?
Deductive reasoning moves from general premises to specific conclusions. This type of reasoning starts with a hypothesis or theory and tests it against evidence to reach a logical conclusion.
Which best explains how a historian synthesizes evidence to reach a conclusion?
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
Which best explains how a historian synthesized evidence to reach a conclusion?
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
How can a conclusion be reached?
A conclusion can be reached by carefully analyzing all relevant information and evidence, considering different perspectives, identifying patterns or trends, and making logical inferences based on the available data. It is important to critically evaluate the information and ensure that the conclusion is supported by the evidence.
Which requires interpretation or that which requires the judge or jury to reach a conclusion based upon what the evidence indicates?
This refers to circumstantial evidence, which requires the judge or jury to draw inferences and make conclusions based on the facts presented, rather than direct evidence that conclusively proves a fact. It involves reasoning and weighing the evidence to determine the most likely explanation or conclusion.
What are the two parts of an argument?
The two parts of a logical argument are the premise (or premises) and the conclusion. The premise is the part of an argument that visibly have evidence or logical steps to reach a conclusion. A conclusion is the result of the reasoning in the premise.
How does James racheal reach to the conclusion of partial bias?
How does james racheal reach to the conclusion of partial bias?
What mistake is the reason that lead to an invalid conclusion?
One mistake that can lead to an invalid conclusion is using faulty logic, such as making hasty generalizations or relying on anecdotal evidence. It's important to ensure that the reasoning process is sound and based on reliable information and logical arguments to reach a valid conclusion.
What conclusion did the judge reach concerning Mr. and Mrs. Theodorkis?
The judge concluded that Mr. and Mrs. Theodorkis were not guilty of the charges brought against them based on the evidence presented in court.
What word means reach a decision?
Conclusion
What is a conclusion you reach by inductive reasoning?
A conjecture.
When many scientists reach the same conclusion the conclusion can be called?
A theory. It's not "popular" -_-
