circumstantial evidence
This refers to circumstantial evidence, which requires the judge or jury to draw inferences and make conclusions based on the facts presented, rather than direct evidence that conclusively proves a fact. It involves reasoning and weighing the evidence to determine the most likely explanation or conclusion.
Indirect evidence refers to information that requires some form of inference or interpretation to establish a connection to a particular fact or conclusion. It does not directly prove a point but rather provides clues or support for a theory or argument. Examples include circumstantial evidence or expert opinions.
Hair is considered direct evidence when it can be definitively linked to a specific individual through DNA analysis. This typically requires a root or follicle attached to the hair shaft for successful identification.
The US Supreme Court ruled that the transfer of an inmate to a mental health hospital requires at a minimum a formal adversarial proceeding with notice, the right to attend and present evidence, and a written statement by the factfinder explaining the evidence relied on and reasons for the transfer. This is to ensure the inmate's due process rights are protected.
A subpoena is a court order that requires an individual to appear in court to testify or produce certain documents or evidence. Failure to comply with a subpoena can result in legal consequences, such as being held in contempt of court. Subpoenas are commonly used in legal proceedings to gather information or compel witness testimony.
Becoming a fingerprint officer typically requires a bachelor's degree and specialized training, which can take around 4-6 years. However, the exact timeframe can vary depending on educational and job experience requirements set by individual agencies or jurisdictions.
When readers come across implied textual evidence, they have to analyze the context, language, and tone to infer the meaning or message that is not directly stated. This requires critical thinking and interpretation to understand the author's intentions behind the text.
Of course it does.
This requires anecdotal evidence, so there is no accurate answer. The writer's conclusion, as both a former drinker and addiction counselor, is that -- of those who drive at all -- most will eventually drive impaired.
non literal
A theme that requires the reader to give an analysis of the discourse and rhetoric is one that requires careful reading and interpretation of the text. One example would be a mystery/suspense novel that requires you to be able to connect the dots by paying close attention to the clues given by the writer. You also need to be able to recognize and discard red herrings.
there are many separate activities and a lot of work :)
The Escobedo rule
A good interpretation of irony or symbolism in a story involves identifying elements that go against readers' expectations or convey deeper meanings beyond the literal. It requires understanding the context in which these elements are used and linking them to broader themes or messages in the story. Effective interpretations can enrich readers' understanding of the text and enhance their appreciation of the author's craft.
Sience is objective and requires empiracle evidence. Philosophy is subjective and does not require empiracle evidence.
evidence
Discovery
Exclusionary Rule