0
What else can I help you with?
What a Sentence for evidence?
The fingerprint found at the crime scene is considered a key piece of evidence in the investigation.
During what stage of a trial do direct examination and cross examination occur?
Direct examination and cross examination occur during the trial phase known as the presentation of evidence.
Is it considered a hearsay statement if the defendant struck plaintiff and a witness testimony that she saw the defendant strike the plaintiff?
No, a witness testifying that they personally saw the defendant strike the plaintiff is not considered hearsay. Hearsay involves relaying information heard from someone else outside of the courtroom. Since the witness is providing firsthand knowledge of the event, their testimony is typically admissible as direct evidence.
Is alleged considered as evidence?
no. Added: Alleged derives from the word ALLEGATION - "The assertion, declaration or statement of a party of what he believes he can prove." Allegations become EVIDENCE only after they are proven.
What are the sources of circumstantial evidences?
Sources of circumstantial evidence can include witness testimony, physical evidence such as fingerprints or DNA, behavior of the accused before or after the incident, and any other indirect evidence that implies a connection to the crime. Circumstantial evidence is not based on direct observation but on inference, making it important to consider in the context of the overall case.
Would a receipt for the purchase of the murder weapon be considered direct or circumstantial evidence?
The receipt would be direct evidence as to who is the owner of the weapon, and circumstantial evidence as to who is the murderer.
Are fingerprints considered direct evidence?
Yes, fingerprints are considered direct evidence because they are physical evidence that directly links a person to a crime scene. They provide a unique and identifiable connection between an individual and the location or object in question.
What is evidence derived from one or more of the five senses?
Empirical evidence is evidence that is obtained through observation or experimentation using the five senses. This evidence is based on direct sensory experience and is considered objective and reliable in scientific research and investigation.
Is blood direct evidence in a crime scene investigation?
Yes, blood can be considered direct evidence in a crime scene investigation because it can provide crucial information about the events that occurred, such as the presence of a victim or suspect at the scene.
Why is hair considered class evidence?
Hair is considered class evidence because it cannot be individualized to a single person based on microscopic characteristics alone. While hair can provide information on characteristics such as color and texture, it is not unique enough to definitively match to a single individual like DNA or fingerprints.
What is ambient evidence?
direct evidence
Why hair is considered to be circumstantial evidence and not as positive a means of identifying a suspect as fingerprints are?
Hair does not have unique characteristics like fingerprints do. While it can provide important information such as DNA analysis, hair evidence alone is not as definitive for identification purposes because multiple individuals can have similar hair characteristics.
What is evidence how is direct evidence different from inderict evidence?
Direct evidence are visible noticable changes. Indirect evidence is when you might not see the action happen but you do notice the results
What is the direct evidence that the world is round?
direct evidence there are pictures from space to prove that the world is round
Does circumstantial evidence hold up in court as a reliable form of proof?
Circumstantial evidence can be considered reliable in court, but it may not be as strong as direct evidence. It can still be used to prove a case if it is convincing and points to a logical conclusion.
What type of evidence is an eyewitness testimony?
Direct Evidence.
Why is biochemical evidence of evolution considered to be indirect?
Biochemical evidence of evolution is considered indirect because it does not provide direct evidence of specific evolutionary events or transitions in the fossil record. Instead, it demonstrates similarities in molecular structures or sequences across different species, which support the idea of a common ancestor but do not directly show the process of evolution occurring.
