Innovations and the conditions to have those innovations.
Rome was a city-state in Italy, which was so successful at expanding to become an empire, that it absorbed the Greek city-states.
Rome's government was so successful because the empire was so efficent. The Romans had paved roads and powerful armies to protect citizens too.
I don't think Romania ever had an empire.
Rome protected its empire with its ARMY!Rome protected its empire with its ARMY!Rome protected its empire with its ARMY!Rome protected its empire with its ARMY!Rome protected its empire with its ARMY!Rome protected its empire with its ARMY!Rome protected its empire with its ARMY!Rome protected its empire with its ARMY!Rome protected its empire with its ARMY!
It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.
Its track record speaks for its success. Until the time of the Romans, there had never been an empire its size. There had never been an empire that absorbed the cultures of those it conquered, there had never been an army as strong as Rome's and there had never been an empire that lasted as long as Rome's.
No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.
They helped make Rome an empire........I think
Constitution! }i{
No rome was not the first Empire in the worldalexander the great had an empire before rome, Xerse had a empire, Egypt was an empire. All of these were before rome
Rome did not go from a republic to an empire. They are two different things. The republic was/is a form of government while an empire is a political holding. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. What is generally referred to as the "empire" is properly called the principate, in which the empire was ruled by one person rather than the collective senate.Rome did not go from a republic to an empire. They are two different things. The republic was/is a form of government while an empire is a political holding. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. What is generally referred to as the "empire" is properly called the principate, in which the empire was ruled by one person rather than the collective senate.Rome did not go from a republic to an empire. They are two different things. The republic was/is a form of government while an empire is a political holding. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. What is generally referred to as the "empire" is properly called the principate, in which the empire was ruled by one person rather than the collective senate.Rome did not go from a republic to an empire. They are two different things. The republic was/is a form of government while an empire is a political holding. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. What is generally referred to as the "empire" is properly called the principate, in which the empire was ruled by one person rather than the collective senate.Rome did not go from a republic to an empire. They are two different things. The republic was/is a form of government while an empire is a political holding. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. What is generally referred to as the "empire" is properly called the principate, in which the empire was ruled by one person rather than the collective senate.Rome did not go from a republic to an empire. They are two different things. The republic was/is a form of government while an empire is a political holding. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. What is generally referred to as the "empire" is properly called the principate, in which the empire was ruled by one person rather than the collective senate.Rome did not go from a republic to an empire. They are two different things. The republic was/is a form of government while an empire is a political holding. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. What is generally referred to as the "empire" is properly called the principate, in which the empire was ruled by one person rather than the collective senate.Rome did not go from a republic to an empire. They are two different things. The republic was/is a form of government while an empire is a political holding. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. What is generally referred to as the "empire" is properly called the principate, in which the empire was ruled by one person rather than the collective senate.Rome did not go from a republic to an empire. They are two different things. The republic was/is a form of government while an empire is a political holding. Rome was an empire under the republican form of government. What is generally referred to as the "empire" is properly called the principate, in which the empire was ruled by one person rather than the collective senate.
United Empire: Rome Western Empire: Rome then Ravenna Eastern Empire: Constantinople