###### Asked in Science

Science

# What type of thinking deprecated true science from false science?

**We need you to answer this question!**

###### If you know the answer to this question, please register to join our limited beta program and start the conversation right now!

## Related Questions

###### Asked in Science

### What type of thinking that involves evaluating evidence can separate true science from false science?

Critical thinking is the answer. We would also accept skeptical
thinking.
Science involves 3 things. Making a testable hypothesis, testing
it, and evaluating it. Any time you can do those three things in a
repeatable fashion (ie I can tell you how to do what I did and it
works for you too) you have 'done true science'.
False science provides an un-testable hypothesis, then tries to
'prove' it using misdirection, insinuation, or bad testing
procedures.

###### Asked in Computer Programming, Math and Arithmetic

### What is the result of True AND False OR True?

True AND False OR True evaluates to True.
IT seems like it does not matter which is evaluated first
as:
(True AND False) OR True = False OR True = True
True AND (False OR True) = True AND True = True
But, it does matter as with False AND False OR True:
(False AND False) OR True = False OR True = True
False AND (False OR True) = False AND True = False
and True OR False AND False:
(True OR False) AND False = True AND False = False
True OR (False AND False) = True OR False = True
Evaluated left to right gives a different answer if the
operators are reversed (as can be seen above), so AND and OR need
an order of evaluation. AND can be replaced by multiply, OR by add,
and BODMAS says multiply is evaluated before add; thus AND should
be evaluated before OR - the C programming language follows this
convention.
This makes the original question:
True AND False OR True = (True AND False) OR True = False OR
True = True

###### Asked in Math and Arithmetic, Algebra, Geometry

### How do you construct a truth table for parenthesis not p q parenthesis if and only if p?

Assuming that you mean not (p or q) if and only if P
~(PVQ)--> P
so now construct a truth table, (just place it vertical since i
cannot place it vertical through here.)
P True True False False
Q True False True False
(PVQ) True True True False
~(PVQ) False False False True
~(PVQ)-->P True True True False
if it's ~(P^Q) -->P
then it's,
P True True False False
Q True False True False
(P^Q) True False False False
~(P^Q) False True True True
~(P^Q)-->P True True False False