None, because there were no flowering plants except in the middle Cretaceous and late Cretaceous, which means only 2/9 of the dinosaur time there were flowers but no vegetables or fruits.
I would advise against it. In their natural habitat, the only food they would eat is - insects !
Dinosaurs were everywhere because the continents were all smooshed together witch is called Pangea. Dinosaurs would rome and rome every continent.
Dead dinosaurs would have been scavenged by carnivorous dinosaurs, crocodilians, and other meat eating animals. One dinosaur that had an especially good sense of smell and could have easily found carrion was Tyrannosaurus.
Sharks biomes are ocean biomes. A biome is the habitat that something would be found in. In this case talking about sharks, the biome is the ocean since that is the habitat that sharks are found in.
Mostly other dinosaurs. However, there were some ferocious non-dinosaurs during the Mesozoic, such as giant crocodiles (e.g., Phobsuchus) which could have killed and eaten all but the very biggest dinos. Some of the great sea-lizards -- also non-dinosaurs -- during the period could have killed dinosaurs if they'd encountered them, but such combats would have been unlikely since each type of creature lived in a different habitat.
Absolutely. There is no reason to think that dinosaurs were colored any differently than animals today. And just like you can find animals of every color (including black) you would have likely found dinosaurs of every color as well.
First, we'd have to learn to live in harmony with the natural environment today. Large animals like dinosaurs would be more vulnerable to the effects of habitat destruction from humans than modern animals. If we could learn to live in harmony with nature, the question becomes whether we're going back in time to live with them or we're recreating them to live with us. If we brought dinosaurs back and let them roam wild, they would devastate ecosystems until said ecosystems could no longer support them. If we went back in time to live with them, we might be able to coexist if we treated nature with the utmost respect and left plenty of habitat for the dinosaurs. However, the biggest consideration would be us introducing dangerous microbes to their habitat, or their habitat containing disease to which we have no immunity.
Young dinosaurs would have been called hatchlings. If you are asking what evolved from dinosaurs, the only descendants of dinosaurs are the birds.
The reason that so few dinosaurs have been found in Antarctica is because it is almost impossible to dig for fossils on most of Antarctica. First, most if it is underneath a mile of ice. Secondly, because Antarctica is so harsh, few paleontologists go to dig even in the areas of rock that are exposed. To me, for those reasons, it's surprising that any dinosaurs have been found in Antarctica.
That would be hard to say As arthritispredates man kind. we have even found signs of it in the bones of dinosaurs.
Depends. Some would have other dinosaurs while others would have leaves.
Plants need sunlight to photosynthesize. Without sunlight, the plants would have died, and they would have become unhealthy for the herbivorous dinosaurs. These dinosaurs would have then died and rotted, becoming unhealthy for the carnivorous dinosaurs, thus causing the carnivorous to die.