Want this question answered?
Cleopatra was a real ****. She took advantage of her beauty and was ruthless. she only thinks of power (and loves her people...weird) even when she was dyeing.
It seems that on her own she had little or no leadership qualities. Although she was of royal birth, she needed the backing of Rome to establish her reign.
Her weakness was mainly her addiction to chocolate. She also suffered from anoya. This is a chronic disease that makes you annoy people without trying to. She annoyed a bunch of people and so they hated her. Cleopatra also loved snakes. This was a particularly dangerous passion because snakes need to eat sometimes...... These weaknesses contributed to her death or so it was thought! Recent discoveries show ancient chocolate boxes and snake fossils on a distant island in the Bahamas that are dated back to 213B.C this is after Cleopatra was assumed dead proving that she did NOT kill herself! The end.....
The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.
Strengths: Shows loyalty in his disire to reach home Trickery Leadership over his men WitsWeaknesses: Pride Sensualness
her weaknees was her husdben
poor military leadership
Cleopatra led her country to disaster. The lasting effects were the end of her dynasty and the loss of her country's independence.
Cleopatra was a real ****. She took advantage of her beauty and was ruthless. she only thinks of power (and loves her people...weird) even when she was dyeing.
It seems that on her own she had little or no leadership qualities. Although she was of royal birth, she needed the backing of Rome to establish her reign.
The best leadership theory depends on the context and situation. Some popular theories include transformational leadership, situational leadership, and servant leadership. Each theory has its strengths and weaknesses, so it's important for leaders to understand and apply the most suitable theory for their specific circumstances.
Cleopatra counted on Antony's weakness for luxury and self-indulgence. She first caught his attention by sailing up the river at Tarsus in her elaborate barge. She invited him to dinner an played on his weaknesses to get what she wanted.
David's strengths - took leadership, courageous, forgave people, poet, warrior, storyteller, musician, and shepherd David's weaknesses - a beautiful woman named Bathsheba
Her weakness was mainly her addiction to chocolate. She also suffered from anoya. This is a chronic disease that makes you annoy people without trying to. She annoyed a bunch of people and so they hated her. Cleopatra also loved snakes. This was a particularly dangerous passion because snakes need to eat sometimes...... These weaknesses contributed to her death or so it was thought! Recent discoveries show ancient chocolate boxes and snake fossils on a distant island in the Bahamas that are dated back to 213B.C this is after Cleopatra was assumed dead proving that she did NOT kill herself! The end.....
The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.The answer to your question would have to be no, Cleopatra was not famous for leadership. She depended upon others, such as Caesar and Antony to establish and keep her on the throne. She was actually a minor queen and if it were not for the civil war between Antony and Octavian, history would barely have mentioned her.
The national government did not have the power to tax. It did not have the power to enforce laws. Congress lacked strong and steady leadership.
Some weaknesses of Prince Caspian include his lack of experience in battle tactics and leadership, his tendency to doubt himself and his decisions, and his struggle to gain the respect and loyalty of his followers due to being a relatively unknown figure.