The Mayan social structure was divided into the king, nobles, priests, merchants and artisans, and peasants and slaves. There was halach uninic, also called the ahau.
me no no
go to this web site http://www.kn.pacbell.com/wired/fil/pages/listmayansms1.HTML yeah right the mayans only have some retarted temple in Belize dat goes all da way to guatamala and Peru lol well not retarted
limestone
The Aztecs were basically Gays, as they are still today all over Mexico. The Mayans were not.
The Mayans organized their cities around ceremonial centers with temples and pyramids. They also had a hierarchical social structure with a ruler at the top, followed by nobles, priests, and commoners. The cities were planned with a grid-like layout, featuring plazas, ball courts, and residential areas.
The ruler, the ruled and unifying god!
yes
1.The Mayans thought that human sacrifice was necessary to please their gods while the Incas only made offerings of food, animals, etc. 2. The Mayan had a spoken and written language while the Inca only had a spoken language.3. The Inca had a different social structure from the Maya. The Inca divided their people in different classes and the government controlled everything, including the amount of food given to the people. As a result, the Inca had a better social structure then the Mayans. The Mayan had a simple social structure: The king controls everything and what he says goes.
The mayans main crop was Maize (corn) and the Arawaks main crop was Cassava. Hope this helped... This was a social difference.
the social structure was the government
social structure
yes Sumer did have social structure