Want this question answered?
ethical concerns
During World War II, U.S. leaders, officials, scientists, and others debated using the atomic bomb on Japan primarily because of the moral implications of such an attack. They were concerned as to whether they would be justified in using such a destructive weapon -- against which there was no defense. Moreover, they were concerned as to what the future implications might be if they were the first to unleash such a weapon into the world.
The vast majority of scientists support evolution. There is no longer any debate in the scientific community about whether evolution occurs, only the mechanisms in which evolution acts upon is debated.
It is debated as to whether or not St. Cyril was responsible for her death.
Debate is already a verb because it is an action.Other verbs are debates, debating and debated."We are in a heated debate"."They are debating whether strawberries or oranges are better"."They debated through the night".
Whether or not ANY human beings have a soul is a metaphysical question debated for millenia. If soldiers have souls, it is because all people do.
because they are mad
Because obesity is caused by both genetic and environmental
Because scientist must decide whether what they are doing will be considered acceptable to majority of society.
In ancient Rome whether to declare war or not was debated in the senate. The issue was then referred to the Assembly of the Soldiers, which voted on war and peace.
because if something goes wrong other scientists need to know what to do whether it is to get out or clean it up
Hypotheses are useful because they can be tested, and scientists love to test to prove if whether your theory is right or wrong.