0
What was a factor in the 1987 Supreme Court ruling to uphold a companies affirmative action policies to hire and promote more women in minorities?
The Supreme Court ruled that certain industries had a history of discrimination in hiring &.
certain industries had a history of discrimination in hiring.
What else can I help you with?
California medical school applicant whose case led a divided supreme court to uphold limited forms of affirmative action for minorities?
Allen bakke
What was a factor in the 1987 Supreme Court ruling to uphold a company and acirc and 128 and 153s affirmative action policy to hire and promote more women and minorities?
In the 1987 Supreme Court case Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education, a key factor in upholding the affirmative action policy was the recognition of the need to address historical discrimination and its lingering effects on employment opportunities for women and minorities. The Court acknowledged that such policies were essential for promoting diversity and achieving equality in the workplace, thereby justifying the use of affirmative action as a means to rectify systemic inequities. This ruling highlighted the importance of fostering an inclusive environment and ensuring fair representation within organizations.
Why couldn't bakke as a white be required to yield to disadvanteged minorities in the admissions process?
Bakke, a white applicant, argued that affirmative action policies at the University of California, Davis, which set aside slots for disadvantaged minorities, discriminated against him based on his race. The Supreme Court ruled in 1978 that while affirmative action is permissible, rigid racial quotas are unconstitutional. The court emphasized that all applicants should be evaluated on individual merit rather than being subject to predetermined racial criteria, thus affirming that Bakke should not be denied admission solely based on his race.
Who ultimately decides what effects such things as affirmative action have on the country?
The impact of affirmative action policies on the country is typically evaluated through a combination of legislative decisions, judicial rulings, public opinion, and empirical research. Ultimately, the effects are influenced by how these different stakeholders interpret and implement affirmative action measures in various contexts.
What are democratic views on affirmative action?
Democratic views on affirmative action vary, but most Democrats support it as a means to promote equality and diversity. They believe that affirmative action is necessary to address historical disadvantages faced by marginalized groups, and it helps to create a more inclusive and equitable society. Democrats generally argue that affirmative action policies should be implemented to ensure equal opportunities in education, employment, and other areas.
Issues surrounding affirmative action are ultimately decided by?
supreme court jsut a guess
What was a factor in the 1987 Supreme Court ruling to uphold a company and affirmative action policy to hire and promote more women and minorities?
The Supreme Court ruled that certain industries had a history of discrimination in hiring &. certain industries had a history of discrimination in hiring.
WHAT IS The Supreme Court's position on quotas for minorities can best be described as?
Deeply divided
What is the first major supreme Court case that challenged affirmative action?
University of California v. Bakke
Recent Supreme Court rulings have indicated that affirmative action programs in schools are what?
Should treat everyone equally.
Which action did the Marbury v. Madison ruling make possible?
the supreme court voids a new tax because it unconstitutionally targets religious minorities.
What does the Supreme Court determine its policies in?
Just think about it.
