0
What else can I help you with?
What was the brahes theory of the universe?
it was i don't know this website is no help at all.this is stupid website.b****es
Why was Brahes work helpful even though his theory of the universe was incorrect?
This is because he explained the sun's role in the universe!
How was brahes death interesting?
because the widespread of the technological theory was WRONG! he died from a bullet wound. He actually survived that, making it interesting, but then simply died of old age
What has the author Oluf Bang written?
Oluf Bang has written: 'Lebensbeschreibung des Tycho v. Brahes'
What has the author Sophie Brahe Rosenkrantz written?
Sophie Brahe Rosenkrantz has written: 'sophie Brahes regnskabsbog, 1627-40'
Who discovered a new star in cassiopeia?
Tycho Brahes discovered a new star in Cassiopeia.
What is a unifying explanation for a broad range of observations facts and tested hypothesis?
It is a scientific theory
How does a theory develop?
Theory-practice-theory take existing theory in education, apply to distance learning, develop new theory Practice-research-theory see what is happening in distance learning, submit to research, develop theory from results Theory-theory-research/practice build on an initial theory to develop a second theory, then apply and test it
Is Illinois a lien or a title theory state?
Indiana is a lien theory state.Indiana is a lien theory state.Indiana is a lien theory state.Indiana is a lien theory state.
List of scientific theories?
Theory of law. Theory of the climate. Theory of lax. Theory of vandals. Newtons's theory of mass.
What is a Common theory?
A common theory is a theory which has not been proven or a theory without evidence.
Kelper used brahes observations to show that the orbits of the the planets are.?
The question is going for the answer "elliptical". But it needs an important comment:Kepler didn't show that the orbits of the planets "are" anything. He had no way to do that.What he showed was the fact that a system of elliptical orbits with the sun at the centerof everything fits the actual observed evidence better than any other proposed model.That didn't prove anything. It only made his model the best, most likely representation ofthe truth, until something better comes along. You might say it was "just a theory".That's how Science works.
