0
The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.
The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.
The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.
The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.
The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.
The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.
The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.
The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.
The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThe group that historians call the five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius, and Marcus Aurelius.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agowhat ideals were taught in the legends of the Good Emperors in Ancient China
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoThe 5 good emperors in the Roman Emipre are Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoThe so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.
Wiki User
∙ 14y agome
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
From the five good emperors who was the greatest emperors?
Trajan, Hadrian and Marcus Aurelius are considered the most outstanding among the five good emperors. Aurelian, Diocletian, Constantine I (or the Great) Theodosius I (or the Great) and Justinian I (or the Great) are considered the most outstanding emperors after the five good emperors.
What made the 5 good emperors good?
The term five good emperors was coined by Machiavelli and is still used today. He mentioned six emperors who ruled well: Titus (ruled 71-81) Nerva (96-98 AD), Trajan (98-117), Hadrian (117-138), Antoninus Pius (138-161) and Marcus Aurelius (161-180). However, he used the term five good emperors, which excluded Titus, because Titus was the son of the emperor Vespasian, while the other five men succeeded by adoption (by the previous emperor). Machiavelli thought that they were good rulers because they did not inherit the throne by birth. He also said that when emperors inherited the throne by birth again, bad rule started again. He wrote: 'From the study of this history we may also learn how a good government is to be established; for while all the emperors who succeeded to the throne by birth, except Titus, were bad, all who were good succeeded by adoption, as in the case of the five from Nerva to Marcus. But as soon as the empire fell once more to the heirs by birth, its ruin recommenced.' Machiavelli said that five good emperors were good rulers and exercised good governance. They were benign rulers, lived good lives pursued moderate policies, ruled wisely, allowed a lot of freedom and earned the goodwill of the people. The term five good emperors involve a bias on the part of Machiavelli because not all he emperors by birth which preceded the five good emperors were bad The famous 18th century historian Edward Gibbon wrote that during the reign of the five good emperors: "The vast extent of the Roman Empire was governed by absolute power, under the guidance of virtue and wisdom. The armies were restrained by the firm but gentle hand of five successive emperors, whose characters and authority commanded respect. The forms of the civil administration were carefully preserved by [these emperors], who delighted in the image of liberty, and were pleased with considering themselves as the accountable ministers of the laws. Such princes deserved the honour of restoring the republic had the Romans of their days been capable of enjoying a rational freedom."
What were there 5 of in ANCIENT ROME?
The five ancient Rome is emperors there where only five emperors
Was the roman empire a good or bad thing?
_Bad_Good"> Bad Good1.Caligula (37-41) 1.Nevra (96-98)2.Elagabalus (218-224) 2.Trajan (98-117)3.Commodus (180-192) 3.Hadrian (117-138)4.Nero (54-68) 4.Antoninus Pius (138-161)5.Domitian (81-96) 5.Marcus Aurelius (161-180)
Was octavian the greatest emperor of the five good emperors?
Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.Octavian was not one of the so-called five good emperors. The five good emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius and they reigned well over a hundred years after Octavian. Octavian was, however, a good emperor, perhaps the greatest that Rome produced.
Were all the good emperors adopted?
No, there were good emperors who were biological sons of previous emperors. Titus for one. Some of them were designated as heir without being adopted and others were appointed by the military.
From the five good emperors who was the greatest emperors?
Trajan, Hadrian and Marcus Aurelius are considered the most outstanding among the five good emperors. Aurelian, Diocletian, Constantine I (or the Great) Theodosius I (or the Great) and Justinian I (or the Great) are considered the most outstanding emperors after the five good emperors.
The best of the roman emperors?
Your question is impossible to answer as it calls for an opinion. Ancient Rome had 178 emperors and many of them were good men. However the first name that comes to mind when considering the "best" of the emperors is Augustus as he was not only the first, but he established the principate and set the standards for all the emperors that followed.
What is Title assumed by all Roman emperors?
The title of all Roman emperors is Caesar.
Who are some good emperors but not The Five Good Emperors?
Ancient Rome had many, good emperors. Some of them were Augustus, Tiberius (yes, Tiberius, he left the empire in excellent financial shape), Claudius, Vespasian, Trajan and Hadrian.
What made the 5 good emperors good?
The term five good emperors was coined by Machiavelli and is still used today. He mentioned six emperors who ruled well: Titus (ruled 71-81) Nerva (96-98 AD), Trajan (98-117), Hadrian (117-138), Antoninus Pius (138-161) and Marcus Aurelius (161-180). However, he used the term five good emperors, which excluded Titus, because Titus was the son of the emperor Vespasian, while the other five men succeeded by adoption (by the previous emperor). Machiavelli thought that they were good rulers because they did not inherit the throne by birth. He also said that when emperors inherited the throne by birth again, bad rule started again. He wrote: 'From the study of this history we may also learn how a good government is to be established; for while all the emperors who succeeded to the throne by birth, except Titus, were bad, all who were good succeeded by adoption, as in the case of the five from Nerva to Marcus. But as soon as the empire fell once more to the heirs by birth, its ruin recommenced.' Machiavelli said that five good emperors were good rulers and exercised good governance. They were benign rulers, lived good lives pursued moderate policies, ruled wisely, allowed a lot of freedom and earned the goodwill of the people. The term five good emperors involve a bias on the part of Machiavelli because not all he emperors by birth which preceded the five good emperors were bad The famous 18th century historian Edward Gibbon wrote that during the reign of the five good emperors: "The vast extent of the Roman Empire was governed by absolute power, under the guidance of virtue and wisdom. The armies were restrained by the firm but gentle hand of five successive emperors, whose characters and authority commanded respect. The forms of the civil administration were carefully preserved by [these emperors], who delighted in the image of liberty, and were pleased with considering themselves as the accountable ministers of the laws. Such princes deserved the honour of restoring the republic had the Romans of their days been capable of enjoying a rational freedom."
What were there 5 of in ANCIENT ROME?
The five ancient Rome is emperors there where only five emperors
Who were the first good emperors?
the first good emperor was domitian
Who were the good ''emperors'' and what did they accomplish?
there is none loser
Who were the good emperors what did they accomplish?
there is none loser
Was the roman empire a good or bad thing?
_Bad_Good"> Bad Good1.Caligula (37-41) 1.Nevra (96-98)2.Elagabalus (218-224) 2.Trajan (98-117)3.Commodus (180-192) 3.Hadrian (117-138)4.Nero (54-68) 4.Antoninus Pius (138-161)5.Domitian (81-96) 5.Marcus Aurelius (161-180)
What is a list Roman emperors?
There were 178 Roman emperors. Far too many to list here. To get them all, type in your browser, Roman Emperors/List or even just Roman Emperors, and you'll come up with sites that list them all.
