Want this question answered?
Life was difficult for the peasants in the 1500s. Infant mortality was very high and life expectancy was not very high either.
The more GDP the longer the life expectancy because more services like healthcare and hospitals are available so this means people can receive medication, therefore their diseases are cured, thus avoiding death. As fore infant mortality rate I'm not entirely sure but I think if there is more GDP then there should be reduction in the rate of infant mortality because perhaps the facilities/ services of healthcare will educate people about protection and such.
It depends on the economy. For example, it is not good in China because of the over-population. But in Low-populated places, like Canada, yes it can be good. Basically, it depends on the economy
good
filithy
it was very strict
Hemorrhage: Excessive bleeding during childbirth can lead to severe maternal complications and, in some cases, death. Infections: Inadequate postnatal care and unhygienic birthing conditions can increase the risk of infections, affecting both mother and infant health. Hypertensive disorders: Conditions like preeclampsia and eclampsia can cause serious complications for both mother and infant, leading to mortality if not managed properly. Obstructed labor: Prolonged or obstructed labor can result in birth complications that endanger the lives of both mother and infant. Lack of access to quality healthcare: Limited access to skilled birth attendants, emergency obstetric care, and essential medications can contribute to maternal and infant mortality rates.
a day as a nobleman
They were a mess no hygiene at all.
Yes: exactly like today.
Healthy and flourishing
The average lifespan of early Homo sapiens was around 30-40 years, with a higher infant mortality rate contributing to a lower average lifespan compared to modern times.