Want this question answered?
The Dred Scott decision
14th amendment
The Dred Scott decision stated that people of African decent imported to America were not citizens and not protected by the Constitution. The fourteenth and fifteenth amendments nullified that decision.
The admission of California to the Union - it was too big to be accommodated according to the terms of that compromise.
s
The Dred Scott case effected the nation.It effect the nation by causing it to split the nation.
The Dred Scott decision electrified the the nation. chief justice Roger B. tanry said the Dred Scott was still a slave.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
Southerners benefited the most from the Dred Scott Decision.
It is likely that the Dred Scott decision had little direct effect on the Civil War. However, it is may be that the South felt more justified to pursue the war because of the decision.
Stonewell Jackson thought Dred Scott Decision was a supid idea
The North was upset because the decision declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. - Novanet
The Dred Scott decision in 1857 by the Supreme Court of the United States worsened the situation surrounding slavery by ruling that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered citizens and therefore had no legal rights. This decision fueled tensions between pro- and anti-slavery factions and ultimately contributed to the growing divide that led to the Civil War.
Slaves were prohibited from bringing suit because they weren't citizens.
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
The North was upset because the decision declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. - Novanet
The North was upset because the decision declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. - Novanet