0
What was one form of evidence used to support the Big Bang theory?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
The observation that red shifts of distant galaxies gets greater the further away the galaxies are.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did the big bang theory form the sun?
Hmph. The Big Bang theory did not form the sun. The big bang formed the elements hydrogen, then hydrogen began to create helium. Then stars were formed out of these two elements and that is how our sun was created.
What is the current theory of the start of the universe?
The leading scientific theory regarding the start of the universe is a cosmological model called the "Big Bang", which asserts the universe started out compressed, very hot and dense, that visible matter in its current form was consequent to an outward explosion. Evidence to support the theory includes the currently observable expansion of the universe, and a residual background radiation apparent in all directions.
Where do humans come form according to the big bang theory?
The 'big bang' theory is not concerned in the least with the origin of human beings on earth. It deals with events that took place more than 10 billion years earlier.
What year did the Big Bang theory form?
Fred Hoyle is credited with coining the term Big Bangduring a 1949 radio broadcast
How is the Theory of Evolution different from previous theories?
Previous theories were not particularly scientific. These were that God created all the species simultaneously 6000 years ago. No evidence exists to support that idea. Another theory was that animals spontaneously form in rotting food, like maggots. This theory, too, was largely disproved by Louis Pasteur and others. Evolution was the first theory for the origin of species founded upon a broad survey of existing and prehistoric (fossil) life forms. After 150 years, it remains the only such theory in biology.
What form of evidence is used to to support the big bang theory?
The redshift of distant galaxies, which is normally attributed to the Doppler effect.=========================Comment #1:It's important to include in the answer the fact that the question speaks ofhow science is NOT done. Evidence is not used to support theory. Theoryis the attempt to explain existing evidence. THAT's how science works.
How did the big bang theory form the sun?
Hmph. The Big Bang theory did not form the sun. The big bang formed the elements hydrogen, then hydrogen began to create helium. Then stars were formed out of these two elements and that is how our sun was created.
What is the current theory of the start of the universe?
The leading scientific theory regarding the start of the universe is a cosmological model called the "Big Bang", which asserts the universe started out compressed, very hot and dense, that visible matter in its current form was consequent to an outward explosion. Evidence to support the theory includes the currently observable expansion of the universe, and a residual background radiation apparent in all directions.
Does the big bang theory suggest the moment at which the earth formed?
No. The Big Bang theory is an explanation on the formation of the universe. Earth did not form until billions of years later.
How is a scientific theory different from a conclusion?
A theory is something that you have evidence to support what you think, a conclustion is something you make after an experimant concluding what you have found out.
Who credated milky way?
not who? but what? the big bang theory is the #1 theory, and the galaxy was created by gas clumping together to form the galaxies we know today.
Where do humans come form according to the big bang theory?
The 'big bang' theory is not concerned in the least with the origin of human beings on earth. It deals with events that took place more than 10 billion years earlier.
How does the big bounce theory differ from the big bang theory?
in big bang theory the particles will just move away outside. while in big bounce, a stage will come when all the particles once again will form singularity as the result of big crunch. that's what i think.
What is a textual evidence?
Textual evidence is evidence/support used to support an argument/position, and is derived from reading and drawing from other text. It is provided in the form of quotation, paraphrase, descriptions of theory and also description. Its importance is in the detail, and in paying attention to the detail in words and intent.
What are the biblical supporting arguments for the Big Bang Theory?
Though many Christians and evolutionists alike deny there is any evidence in the Bible that would support the concept of a "big bang" that started the universe, the very fact that Genesis 1 describes how God created the heavens and Earth is Biblical evidence that supports the concept of the "Big Bang Theory." Certainly, when God spoke out the existance of the heavens and earth, there would have been a sudden, or "big bang" manifestation of the words He spoke out. Where those who believe in creation actually differ from those who believe in evolution comes after "The Big Bang." While evolutionists believe life came into existence by chance, creationists believe life came into existence by design. They also differ in that evolutionists believe all life evolved from a simple organism, while creationists believe each life form is a result of a unique creation of God. In evolution, man is an evolved life form, and in creation, man is the unique creation of God.
How is the scientific theory from a conclusion?
A theory is like a guess made with little or no evidence from experiments. A conclusion is drawn after a good amount of experiments and the relevant evidence being presented in a sensible form.
Did the Big Bang crate everything in the universe?
you are most likely aware of what the big bang theory is. it did not create everything in the universe as the way it is today. it actually created the foundation for everythin in the known universe. for example, the grand canyon did not form from the big band theory, it just put the matter in the right place for it to form.
