Abraham Lincoln was one of the US's more studious US presidents. He honed his skills as an attorney and became involved in several high profile cases as an attorney. His courtroom activites also helped him in his debating skills. For example, against the well known orator, Senator Stephan Douglas, he was masterful in his debates when he ran in 1858 for the Illinois US senate seat. Lincoln also is the only US President to have been awarded a US Patent. Aside from those activities, Lincoln used another technique to sharpen his mental skills. He taught himself to master the principles of Euclidean geometry.
Yes it is true that scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence. For a hypothesis to have value, it must be testable is true also.
we use it in sentences like the word 'because' or 'therefore' we use that in a logical argument
All of the Above
Aristotle believed in a balance between logic and emotion. He felt that logic was required for strong and valid arguments. Emotions reinforced logical arguments.
The statement "Fossil fuel emissions contribute to global warming because they release greenhouse gases that trap heat in the atmosphere" uses logical arguments to appeal to reason by making a clear cause-and-effect connection between fossil fuel emissions and their impact on the environment.
A critical reader looking for logos is seeking logical reasoning and evidence in the text to support the argument being made. They are interested in clear and rational points that are backed up with facts, data, and examples to persuade and inform the audience effectively.
I would suggest you try to convince them with logical arguments.
Actually, a logical fallacy is a flaw in reasoning that makes an argument invalid, unsound, or weak. It occurs when there is a mistake in the logic being used to reach a conclusion. Common examples include ad hominem attacks, straw man arguments, and appeals to emotion.
The preamble is the philosophical backbone of the Declaration of Independence and includes a series of logical arguments that flow one from another.
A logical fallacy is a flaw in reasoning that makes an argument invalid or unsound. It can be due to incorrect reasoning or misuse of logic to lead to a false or misleading conclusion. Identifying fallacies helps in constructing and evaluating strong arguments.
providing relevant facts and statistics to support your argument, using logical reasoning to connect your points cohesively, and addressing potential counterarguments to strengthen your position.
The AND function.