0
What else can I help you with?
Scientist are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence?
Logos refers to the process of persuading a person or group using supportive evidence. A researcher must conduct experiments using the scientific method, and generate reliable and valid results
What does prevailing arguments mean?
Prevailing arguments refer to viewpoints or opinions that are currently the most widely accepted or dominant within a particular context or field of discussion. These arguments are often supported by evidence and have gained widespread acceptance among experts or the general public.
A theory is supported by?
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
Do most scientists agree that there is conclusive evidence that carbon dioxide drives climate?
Yes, the vast majority of climate scientists agree that there is conclusive evidence showing that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are driving climate change. This consensus is supported by multiple lines of evidence, including historical data, climate models, and physical principles.
What do scientist not base there conclusions on?
Scientists do not base their conclusions on personal beliefs, anecdotal evidence, or emotional appeals. Instead, they rely on empirical data, rigorous experimentation, and peer-reviewed research to draw objective conclusions. Conclusions must be reproducible and supported by evidence rather than opinion or speculation. Additionally, scientists aim to minimize bias and ensure that their findings are based on systematic observation and analysis.
Scientist are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence?
Logos refers to the process of persuading a person or group using supportive evidence. A researcher must conduct experiments using the scientific method, and generate reliable and valid results
Where did scientists finally find evidence that supported wegeners ideas?
Mid-Ocean Ridge
What is it that makes an argument inductive?
Inductive arguments are those supposedly supported by good, but not conclusive, evidence. The idea of conclusive or demonstrative evidence goes with deductive arguments, whereas the idea of less than conclusive or demonstrative evidence goes with inductive arguments. Inductive arguments are based on probability; if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true.
Is scientific evidence supported with theories?
You have it backwards. Theories are supported by evidence. Evidence is not supported by theories, evidence is simply observed.
What does prevailing arguments mean?
Prevailing arguments refer to viewpoints or opinions that are currently the most widely accepted or dominant within a particular context or field of discussion. These arguments are often supported by evidence and have gained widespread acceptance among experts or the general public.
What are the arguments for and against DNA evidence?
There are many arguments for and against DNA evidence. One argument is that it cannot be disproved as deciding evidence.
Are biased statements supported by evidence?
No, biased statements are not supported by evidence.
What do scientists call theories that explain all the evidence?
Scientists call theories that explain all the evidence and are widely accepted by the scientific community "well-established theories" or "well-supported theories." These theories are based on a large body of evidence and have withstood rigorous testing and scrutiny.
What evidence is used to refute theory of evolution?
There is no evidence that refutes the theory of evolution by natural selection. Critiques and arguments by creationist and ID advocates are always poorly thought out and easily shown to be wrong by even undergraduates. The arguments use straw men and other fallacies plus they have been refuted so many times that to bring one of these arguments up is to self parody.
How do scientists get empirical evidence?
i know that this is stupid but how do scientists get empirical evidence.
Why do writer's use evidence in their writing?
They use evidence to support their arguments.
What is reasonable conclusion?
A reasonable conclusion is one that is supported by evidence, logic, and reasoning. It is based on careful consideration of all relevant information, and it follows logically from the facts presented. A reasonable conclusion is open to revision in light of new evidence or arguments.
