0
What else can I help you with?
Scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence?
Yes, in the field of science, the overall consensus is that claims and theories should be backed by empirical evidence and logical reasoning. When scientists present arguments supported by data and experimentation, it enhances the credibility and validity of their findings in the scientific community.
What does prevailing arguments mean?
Prevailing arguments refer to viewpoints or opinions that are currently the most widely accepted or dominant within a particular context or field of discussion. These arguments are often supported by evidence and have gained widespread acceptance among experts or the general public.
The endosymbiotic theory was supported by the scientist?
Lynn Margulis was the scientist who proposed and championed the endosymbiotic theory. She provided evidence to support the idea that eukaryotic cells evolved from symbiotic relationships between different prokaryotic organisms.
A theory is supported by?
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
When a scientist uses logical reasoning to draw a conclusion what does the scientist do?
When a scientist uses logical reasoning to draw a conclusion, they analyze the evidence gathered from experiments or observations to identify patterns and relationships. They apply principles of deductive or inductive reasoning to interpret the data and formulate hypotheses or theories. This process often involves evaluating the validity and reliability of the data, considering alternative explanations, and ensuring that the conclusions are supported by the evidence. Ultimately, logical reasoning helps scientists make informed decisions and contribute to the broader understanding of scientific phenomena.
Scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence?
Yes, in the field of science, the overall consensus is that claims and theories should be backed by empirical evidence and logical reasoning. When scientists present arguments supported by data and experimentation, it enhances the credibility and validity of their findings in the scientific community.
Which of Stalin's arguments is best supported by the evidence in this excerpt?
To provide a concise answer, I would need the specific excerpt you're referring to in order to identify which of Stalin's arguments is best supported by it. Please share the text or key points from the excerpt, and I'll be happy to help!
What is it that makes an argument inductive?
Inductive arguments are those supposedly supported by good, but not conclusive, evidence. The idea of conclusive or demonstrative evidence goes with deductive arguments, whereas the idea of less than conclusive or demonstrative evidence goes with inductive arguments. Inductive arguments are based on probability; if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true.
What does prevailing arguments mean?
Prevailing arguments refer to viewpoints or opinions that are currently the most widely accepted or dominant within a particular context or field of discussion. These arguments are often supported by evidence and have gained widespread acceptance among experts or the general public.
Is scientific evidence supported with theories?
You have it backwards. Theories are supported by evidence. Evidence is not supported by theories, evidence is simply observed.
Why do claims need to be supported or evidence?
Claims need to be supported by evidence to establish their validity and credibility. Evidence provides a foundation for arguments, allowing others to assess the truthfulness and reliability of the claim. Without support, claims can be seen as mere opinions or assertions, which may lead to misunderstandings or misinformation. Ultimately, evidence fosters informed discussions and decision-making.
What are the arguments for and against DNA evidence?
There are many arguments for and against DNA evidence. One argument is that it cannot be disproved as deciding evidence.
Are biased statements supported by evidence?
No, biased statements are not supported by evidence.
What evidence is used to refute theory of evolution?
There is no evidence that refutes the theory of evolution by natural selection. Critiques and arguments by creationist and ID advocates are always poorly thought out and easily shown to be wrong by even undergraduates. The arguments use straw men and other fallacies plus they have been refuted so many times that to bring one of these arguments up is to self parody.
What is reasonable conclusion?
A reasonable conclusion is one that is supported by evidence, logic, and reasoning. It is based on careful consideration of all relevant information, and it follows logically from the facts presented. A reasonable conclusion is open to revision in light of new evidence or arguments.
Why do writer's use evidence in their writing?
They use evidence to support their arguments.
The endosymbiotic theory was supported by the scientist?
Lynn Margulis was the scientist who proposed and championed the endosymbiotic theory. She provided evidence to support the idea that eukaryotic cells evolved from symbiotic relationships between different prokaryotic organisms.
