0
What else can I help you with?
Scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence?
Yes, in the field of science, the overall consensus is that claims and theories should be backed by empirical evidence and logical reasoning. When scientists present arguments supported by data and experimentation, it enhances the credibility and validity of their findings in the scientific community.
What does prevailing arguments mean?
Prevailing arguments refer to viewpoints or opinions that are currently the most widely accepted or dominant within a particular context or field of discussion. These arguments are often supported by evidence and have gained widespread acceptance among experts or the general public.
The endosymbiotic theory was supported by the scientist?
Lynn Margulis was the scientist who proposed and championed the endosymbiotic theory. She provided evidence to support the idea that eukaryotic cells evolved from symbiotic relationships between different prokaryotic organisms.
A theory is supported by?
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
Why do theories have greater certainty than hypotheses?
The hypothesis is just an idea that a scientist has about the way something works or is--for example, a hypothesis that humans don't breathe at night. This is not necessarily supported by any evidence. It's just what the scientist thinks.Theories are established descriptions of the way something works and are based on great amounts of testing. They also have to be supported by substantial evidence. They are generally accepted by all, or at least most, scientists to be true. An example would be the theory of relativity.
Scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence?
Yes, in the field of science, the overall consensus is that claims and theories should be backed by empirical evidence and logical reasoning. When scientists present arguments supported by data and experimentation, it enhances the credibility and validity of their findings in the scientific community.
Which of Stalin's arguments is best supported by the evidence in this excerpt?
To provide a concise answer, I would need the specific excerpt you're referring to in order to identify which of Stalin's arguments is best supported by it. Please share the text or key points from the excerpt, and I'll be happy to help!
What is it that makes an argument inductive?
Inductive arguments are those supposedly supported by good, but not conclusive, evidence. The idea of conclusive or demonstrative evidence goes with deductive arguments, whereas the idea of less than conclusive or demonstrative evidence goes with inductive arguments. Inductive arguments are based on probability; if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true.
Is scientific evidence supported with theories?
You have it backwards. Theories are supported by evidence. Evidence is not supported by theories, evidence is simply observed.
What does prevailing arguments mean?
Prevailing arguments refer to viewpoints or opinions that are currently the most widely accepted or dominant within a particular context or field of discussion. These arguments are often supported by evidence and have gained widespread acceptance among experts or the general public.
What are the arguments for and against DNA evidence?
There are many arguments for and against DNA evidence. One argument is that it cannot be disproved as deciding evidence.
Are biased statements supported by evidence?
No, biased statements are not supported by evidence.
What evidence is used to refute theory of evolution?
There is no evidence that refutes the theory of evolution by natural selection. Critiques and arguments by creationist and ID advocates are always poorly thought out and easily shown to be wrong by even undergraduates. The arguments use straw men and other fallacies plus they have been refuted so many times that to bring one of these arguments up is to self parody.
Why do writer's use evidence in their writing?
They use evidence to support their arguments.
What is reasonable conclusion?
A reasonable conclusion is one that is supported by evidence, logic, and reasoning. It is based on careful consideration of all relevant information, and it follows logically from the facts presented. A reasonable conclusion is open to revision in light of new evidence or arguments.
How do you use the word countervail in a sentence?
"The evidence for evolution countervails over the arguments against it." THis means that evidence for evolution counteracts the arguments against it.
The endosymbiotic theory was supported by the scientist?
Lynn Margulis was the scientist who proposed and championed the endosymbiotic theory. She provided evidence to support the idea that eukaryotic cells evolved from symbiotic relationships between different prokaryotic organisms.
